Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-20-2018, 11:35 AM   #1
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
C2 Saf-T-Liner vs International

Hi all,

I'm new here, and trying to decide between the following two shorties for a conversion for my girlfriend and I as a cross-country summer home (see attachments). We are young and don't need anything too fancy. This is our first conversion. I am located in Boston, MA, am moderately handy and have 3 full months to do whatever we like!

One is an 2006 International 6-window diesel ($5k), while the other is a newer, C2 style Thomas Saf-T-Liner with a Benz engine ($10k).

Personally I feel that the 06 International feels more like a "school bus" to me which I like, despite being a bit older. However the modern C2 style is hard to overlook, with its much flatter/higher ceiling, double-pane RV-style windows, etc.

Do any of you have any additional pros and cons you could list about either of these two options that could help us decide? (ie, the curved windshield on the C2 seems like a pain to ever replace). I'm not very familiar with the C2 Sat-T-Liner, so any advice that could help sway our opinion in either direction might be helpful.

Thank you!
Attached Thumbnails
IMG_20180218_150544.jpg   IMG_20180218_145519.jpg  

darkrider007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 12:10 PM   #2
Bus Nut
 
bigskypc50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: MONTANA
Posts: 471
Year: 1995
Coachwork: AMTRAM
Chassis: INT
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: Big Girl
If you every need to take it to a shop, your wallet with thank you when you have the Navistar. Go even older by a few years and you could do most of the work your self with a simple socket set.

I agree with Cow, I would not take either.
bigskypc50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 12:11 PM   #3
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Winlcok, WA
Posts: 2,233
Personally I wouldn't want either one.

The IC most likely has the VT365/MaxxForce7 engine. It has known issues that cost a lot to mitigate. It most likely has the same amount of headroom as the C2.

All C2's have multiplexed electrical systems. IC didn't start doing that until about 2006 in the CE models. Changing, removing, or adding stuff into a multiplexed system can cause MAJOR electrical issues if you don't know what you are doing. We tried installing a video camera system in a bus that wasn't wired for it and that was enough to make it so the bus wouldn't start.

The M-B engine in the C2 is going to be a piece of junk or a pretty good engine. There isn't a lot of rhyme or reason why one will work great and another won't. The real problem with them is even F-liner dealers don't like working on them and they are the only ones that will touch them. Parts are not inexpensive either.

If you want an IC look for one with the T444E.

If you want a Thomas I would look for one of the older FS65 models.
cowlitzcoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 12:22 PM   #4
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Thanks for the reply - I didn't know that about the VT365/MaxxForce7 engines.

I'll report back once I figure out what it has inside!
darkrider007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 12:45 PM   #5
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
I'm assuming the Multiplex in buses is similar to the CanBus system in bikes and cars.

If you find yourself stuck with one of them, the way we deal with it on motorcycles is simple.

Take a direct feed from the battery to a power distrubution center. There are a few of them around that contain both ignition on and ignition off circuits.

Wire all your accessories from that. The vehicle wiring never sees it, and everything is protected by fuses and relays.
__________________
Steve Bracken

Build Thread
Twigg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 04:46 PM   #6
Bus Geek
 
Jolly Roger bus 223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Swansboro,NC
Posts: 2,988
Year: 86
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Ford B700
Engine: 8.2
Rated Cap: 60 bodies
I worked around a diesel shop last month and watched them do a complete in frame rebuild on a Benz engine in a western star truck.
The shop owner said it is something like 16,000$ for a rebuild or 28,000 for a new engine.
And that road tractor only had a little over 200,000 miles on it?
Good luck
Jolly Roger bus 223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2018, 09:20 PM   #7
Bus Geek
 
Tango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
Mmmmm...a bargain for an MB!
Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 02:26 PM   #8
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
An update on my search:

I was able to find a 2001 International (6 window, 23 passenger) up for auction with the T444 engine in it (200,000 miles, 17,100 hours).

Trying not to get too excited about it, but it seems like exactly what I'm looking for. Any feedback on this guy?



It's in FL so it'd be a decent haul up to MA, but I can't seem to find anything decent up here so far. Might be worth it just for the general lack of rust alone.

edit: tags say GVWR = 25,500 lbs. Isn't this massive for a shortie like this? Should I be concerned? Wonder what kind of gas mileage I will get..

Derek
darkrider007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 03:47 PM   #9
Bus Geek
 
Robin97396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
I’m sure I’m not the only person that will tell you the hours on that bus are crazy high compared to the mileage.
I like that model though. That type of bus, rust free, 466/3000, AC = unicorn.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
Robin97396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 03:58 PM   #10
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
For reference, what kind of hours would you consider normal for a ~200k engine? Also what does 466/3000 mean (I'm new here - sorry!)?

Also: it indeed has a rear AC unit!
darkrider007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 05:09 PM   #11
Bus Geek
 
o1marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
I often wonder if there is an "average" percentage of time idling as opposed to running time. I understand the reasons for long idle times. 200000 miles and 17000 hours works out to 11.76mph, ya, I'd be concerned about that. I see it is quite common to have speedometers replaced, do they wear out at just over 100k? On this bus I would guess the mileage could be substantially more than posted, which is not necessarily a negative.
o1marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 06:49 PM   #12
Bus Geek
 
Robin97396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
Not necessarily a negative, but from what I've learned it's highly suspect of some kind of change. Sometimes a rebuild, sometimes a speedometer. It just doesn't match up correctly. It's quite high hours, but yes they could have gone home and left it idling for several weekends so it would be warm on Monday.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
Robin97396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 06:55 PM   #13
Bus Geek
 
o1marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin97396 View Post
Not necessarily a negative, but from what I've learned it's highly suspect of some kind of change. Sometimes a rebuild, sometimes a speedometer. It just doesn't match up correctly. It's quite high hours, but yes they could have gone home and left it idling for several weekends so it would be warm on Monday.
17000 hours of idling is equal to 2 straight years.
o1marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 07:41 PM   #14
Bus Geek
 
Robin97396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
Like I said, a few weekends. The bus was probably toasty on Mondays.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
Robin97396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 10:16 AM   #15
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Decided to take a pass on it (and its sibling with slightly lesser 164k mi / 14,900 hrs), due to the high engine hours. Disappointing since the miles seemed attractive but hopefully another reliable conventional 5-6 window shorty will come up in the next few weeks or so.

If anyone happens to see one, give me a holler! I would gladly be willing to travel interstate for it.

Thanks!
darkrider007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2018, 01:00 PM   #16
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkrider007 View Post
Hi all,

I'm new here, and trying to decide between the following two shorties for a conversion for my girlfriend and I as a cross-country summer home (see attachments). We are young and don't need anything too fancy. This is our first conversion. I am located in Boston, MA, am moderately handy and have 3 full months to do whatever we like!

One is an 2006 International 6-window diesel ($5k), while the other is a newer, C2 style Thomas Saf-T-Liner with a Benz engine ($10k).

Personally I feel that the 06 International feels more like a "school bus" to me which I like, despite being a bit older. However the modern C2 style is hard to overlook, with its much flatter/higher ceiling, double-pane RV-style windows, etc.

Do any of you have any additional pros and cons you could list about either of these two options that could help us decide? (ie, the curved windshield on the C2 seems like a pain to ever replace). I'm not very familiar with the C2 Sat-T-Liner, so any advice that could help sway our opinion in either direction might be helpful.

Thank you!
Do you have any more pictures of this Thomas C2 MBenz Bus ?

Thanks
cookies is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.