|
02-20-2018, 11:35 AM
|
#1
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
|
C2 Saf-T-Liner vs International
Hi all,
I'm new here, and trying to decide between the following two shorties for a conversion for my girlfriend and I as a cross-country summer home (see attachments). We are young and don't need anything too fancy. This is our first conversion. I am located in Boston, MA, am moderately handy and have 3 full months to do whatever we like!
One is an 2006 International 6-window diesel ($5k), while the other is a newer, C2 style Thomas Saf-T-Liner with a Benz engine ($10k).
Personally I feel that the 06 International feels more like a "school bus" to me which I like, despite being a bit older. However the modern C2 style is hard to overlook, with its much flatter/higher ceiling, double-pane RV-style windows, etc.
Do any of you have any additional pros and cons you could list about either of these two options that could help us decide? (ie, the curved windshield on the C2 seems like a pain to ever replace). I'm not very familiar with the C2 Sat-T-Liner, so any advice that could help sway our opinion in either direction might be helpful.
Thank you!
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 12:10 PM
|
#2
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: MONTANA
Posts: 471
Year: 1995
Coachwork: AMTRAM
Chassis: INT
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: Big Girl
|
If you every need to take it to a shop, your wallet with thank you when you have the Navistar. Go even older by a few years and you could do most of the work your self with a simple socket set.
I agree with Cow, I would not take either.
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 12:11 PM
|
#3
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Winlcok, WA
Posts: 2,233
|
Personally I wouldn't want either one.
The IC most likely has the VT365/MaxxForce7 engine. It has known issues that cost a lot to mitigate. It most likely has the same amount of headroom as the C2.
All C2's have multiplexed electrical systems. IC didn't start doing that until about 2006 in the CE models. Changing, removing, or adding stuff into a multiplexed system can cause MAJOR electrical issues if you don't know what you are doing. We tried installing a video camera system in a bus that wasn't wired for it and that was enough to make it so the bus wouldn't start.
The M-B engine in the C2 is going to be a piece of junk or a pretty good engine. There isn't a lot of rhyme or reason why one will work great and another won't. The real problem with them is even F-liner dealers don't like working on them and they are the only ones that will touch them. Parts are not inexpensive either.
If you want an IC look for one with the T444E.
If you want a Thomas I would look for one of the older FS65 models.
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 12:22 PM
|
#4
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
|
Thanks for the reply - I didn't know that about the VT365/MaxxForce7 engines.
I'll report back once I figure out what it has inside!
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 12:45 PM
|
#5
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
|
I'm assuming the Multiplex in buses is similar to the CanBus system in bikes and cars.
If you find yourself stuck with one of them, the way we deal with it on motorcycles is simple.
Take a direct feed from the battery to a power distrubution center. There are a few of them around that contain both ignition on and ignition off circuits.
Wire all your accessories from that. The vehicle wiring never sees it, and everything is protected by fuses and relays.
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 04:46 PM
|
#6
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Swansboro,NC
Posts: 2,988
Year: 86
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Ford B700
Engine: 8.2
Rated Cap: 60 bodies
|
I worked around a diesel shop last month and watched them do a complete in frame rebuild on a Benz engine in a western star truck.
The shop owner said it is something like 16,000$ for a rebuild or 28,000 for a new engine.
And that road tractor only had a little over 200,000 miles on it?
Good luck
|
|
|
02-20-2018, 09:20 PM
|
#7
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
|
Mmmmm...a bargain for an MB!
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 02:26 PM
|
#8
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
|
An update on my search:
I was able to find a 2001 International (6 window, 23 passenger) up for auction with the T444 engine in it (200,000 miles, 17,100 hours).
Trying not to get too excited about it, but it seems like exactly what I'm looking for. Any feedback on this guy?
It's in FL so it'd be a decent haul up to MA, but I can't seem to find anything decent up here so far. Might be worth it just for the general lack of rust alone.
edit: tags say GVWR = 25,500 lbs. Isn't this massive for a shortie like this? Should I be concerned? Wonder what kind of gas mileage I will get..
Derek
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 03:47 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
|
I’m sure I’m not the only person that will tell you the hours on that bus are crazy high compared to the mileage.
I like that model though. That type of bus, rust free, 466/3000, AC = unicorn.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 03:58 PM
|
#10
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
|
For reference, what kind of hours would you consider normal for a ~200k engine? Also what does 466/3000 mean (I'm new here - sorry!)?
Also: it indeed has a rear AC unit!
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 05:09 PM
|
#11
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
I often wonder if there is an "average" percentage of time idling as opposed to running time. I understand the reasons for long idle times. 200000 miles and 17000 hours works out to 11.76mph, ya, I'd be concerned about that. I see it is quite common to have speedometers replaced, do they wear out at just over 100k? On this bus I would guess the mileage could be substantially more than posted, which is not necessarily a negative.
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 06:49 PM
|
#12
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
|
Not necessarily a negative, but from what I've learned it's highly suspect of some kind of change. Sometimes a rebuild, sometimes a speedometer. It just doesn't match up correctly. It's quite high hours, but yes they could have gone home and left it idling for several weekends so it would be warm on Monday.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 06:55 PM
|
#13
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin97396
Not necessarily a negative, but from what I've learned it's highly suspect of some kind of change. Sometimes a rebuild, sometimes a speedometer. It just doesn't match up correctly. It's quite high hours, but yes they could have gone home and left it idling for several weekends so it would be warm on Monday.
|
17000 hours of idling is equal to 2 straight years.
|
|
|
02-22-2018, 07:41 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Willamina, Oregon
Posts: 6,409
Coachwork: 97 Bluebird TC1000 5.9
|
Like I said, a few weekends. The bus was probably toasty on Mondays.
__________________
Robin
Nobody's Business
|
|
|
02-23-2018, 10:16 AM
|
#15
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
|
Decided to take a pass on it (and its sibling with slightly lesser 164k mi / 14,900 hrs), due to the high engine hours. Disappointing since the miles seemed attractive but hopefully another reliable conventional 5-6 window shorty will come up in the next few weeks or so.
If anyone happens to see one, give me a holler! I would gladly be willing to travel interstate for it.
Thanks!
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 01:00 PM
|
#16
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkrider007
Hi all,
I'm new here, and trying to decide between the following two shorties for a conversion for my girlfriend and I as a cross-country summer home (see attachments). We are young and don't need anything too fancy. This is our first conversion. I am located in Boston, MA, am moderately handy and have 3 full months to do whatever we like!
One is an 2006 International 6-window diesel ($5k), while the other is a newer, C2 style Thomas Saf-T-Liner with a Benz engine ($10k).
Personally I feel that the 06 International feels more like a "school bus" to me which I like, despite being a bit older. However the modern C2 style is hard to overlook, with its much flatter/higher ceiling, double-pane RV-style windows, etc.
Do any of you have any additional pros and cons you could list about either of these two options that could help us decide? (ie, the curved windshield on the C2 seems like a pain to ever replace). I'm not very familiar with the C2 Sat-T-Liner, so any advice that could help sway our opinion in either direction might be helpful.
Thank you!
|
Do you have any more pictures of this Thomas C2 MBenz Bus ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|