Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-26-2014, 10:41 AM   #1
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 38
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: MVP RE
Engine: Cummins 8.3
What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Hi,

We are looking for the perfect bus to buy, not easy.. Here are some of the specs we are looking for.
What bus would you recommend?

- We want to buy the bus in Texas or anywhere along the East Coast.
- The max length for an RV is 12m in Europe, so 39ft length would be perfect.
- The oldest year would be 1998, but if our budget allows it the newer the better.
- Our budget is a max of 6000$
- We want a bus without any rust on important parts
- As we are driving trough the snowy mountains I think a dog nose would be better, I read they our more noisy which I really don't mind, the dog nose looks safer. Length-wise inside do you know the difference?
- I would prefer storage space underneath the bus
- preferable an emergency exit in the back
- diesel
- the higher ceiling the better as Europeans are quite tall.
- best would be from in internationally well known company such as GMC, this would make import in Europe easier.

Do you know by any chance if you could put a double driver seat in the front? I've never seen it but it would be fun.

Thanks.

Letsbenomads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 12:57 PM   #2
Bus Geek
 
Tango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Howdy --- you will find a very wide range of options & configurations out there as many buses are constructed to different school districts specs. You can either go directly through the districts (many still auction directly to anyone with the cash) or through a broker who buys in bulk lots from many different districts. There is an outfit here in the Houston area called 7K Bus Sales that does just that. I bought my first bus (a 40' Blue Bird All-American) from them years ago and they were great to deal with at the time. You can also send such brokers your specs and a willing price and they can shop it for you. That said, you should be able to find a good solid unit under $5K these days. I still see a bunch in the $3500-4000 range. A first person inspection is strongly recommended as condition is a big factor and highly variable. Also, if you can find a unit that comes with it's maintenance records (many do), it will be a real plus as far as evaluating what it has been through and what to expect will require service.

Best of luck with the hunt and let us know how it goes.
Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 11:16 PM   #3
Skoolie
 
schoolmarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Western Tennessee
Posts: 102
Year: 1985
Coachwork: Wayne Chaperone
Chassis: chevy
Engine: 350
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

I thought you guys were going to Europe to start your business!




schoolmarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 11:19 PM   #4
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.

39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.

Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."

Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
nat_ster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 09:38 AM   #5
Skoolie
 
Locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Year: 1990
Coachwork: Crown
Chassis: Super Coach II, 36 Ft. RE
Engine: Cat 3208T, MT643
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

With a rear engine bus you can mount the master bed right over the engine compartment. Conversely, with a front engine flat nose bus the engine takes up less space than with a dog nose, and the back end is even more versatile. You can have up to six bunks in the back (triples on each side), or a bathroom, or even a U-shaped kitchen. Down side is that the F/E flat nose is the noisiest driver of the three types.
And then there's the old Crowns with their mid ship under-floor engine. But you're looking for something newer. Don't rule them out though because a Crown will last longer than just about any other school bus.
__________________
Locutus
(Latin) loquor loqui locutus dep. [to speak (in conversation); to tell , say, declare, talk of].

Children drink kOOlaid, adults drink T.E.A.


Gallery: https://www.skoolie.net/gallery/v/Skooli ... +Coach+II/
Locutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 09:52 AM   #6
Bus Nut
 
JakeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Quote:
Originally Posted by nat_ster
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.

39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.

Nat
The biggest dog-nose I can find is a 72 pass, which is what mine is, but you can find 84 pass flat-noses. That would be only 2 rows of seating, though. So, yes...there is a difference, but I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'. That being said, though, a flat-nose RE would get my vote, just for driving pleasure, if nothing else. One other issue is that both styles of FE buses have a large overhang in the back that can make getting into and out of some places interesting (along with affecting the ride). RE buses have the rear axle back further, to support the weight of the engine, which eliminates that overhang.
__________________
The journey is the destination...

Brutus
JakeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 06:46 PM   #7
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeC
Quote:
Originally Posted by nat_ster
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.

39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.

Nat
I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'.
That number was from memory last summer. I can go measure the difference between the ford b700 (dog nose) and the TC2000 (flat nose) in the morning. I will measure from the front bumper to the back of the drivers seat, and subtract the difference.

Also a ford will have a bit shorter nose than a international.

The flat noses that use DT466's have the front axle about a foot farther back making the front hang over longer.

Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."

Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
nat_ster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 07:33 PM   #8
Almost There
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 89
Year: 1990
Coachwork: International/Thomas
Chassis: 3700
Engine: 7.3
Rated Cap: 73
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

http://www.renebates.com/
http://www.purplewave.com/
auction web sites

IMHO if you can get it directly from a school district and can get a few years of maintenance history you are more likely to get a quality bus
__________________
My conversion thread, viewtopic.php?f=9&t=466746
BUBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 07:42 PM   #9
Bus Nut
 
JakeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

[quote=nat_ster]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeC
Quote:
Originally Posted by "nat_ster":2599er0m
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.

39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.

Nat
I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'.
That number was from memory last summer. I can go measure the difference between the ford b700 (dog nose) and the TC2000 (flat nose) in the morning. I will measure from the front bumper to the back of the drivers seat, and subtract the difference.

Also a ford will have a bit shorter nose than a international.

The flat noses that use DT466's have the front axle about a foot farther back making the front hang over longer.

Nat[/quote:2599er0m]

Sweet. What length and what passenger were they both?
__________________
The journey is the destination...

Brutus
JakeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2014, 10:58 PM   #10
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 124
Year: 1999
Coachwork: ElDorado
Chassis: Chevy P30
Engine: 7.4 liter 454 Chevy
Rated Cap: 24
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Check out government auctions; city, state and federal.
I just got my current ride for 1200.
Bullwhacker007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 08:09 PM   #11
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

92 ford B700, 38 feet long, 72 passenger. Distance from front bumper to back of the drivers seat mounting plate is 8 feet.

92 TC2000, 32 feet long, 66 passenger. Distance from front bumper to back of the drivers seat mounting plate is 4 feet.

8 - 4 = 4

I was way off at 9 feet.

The flat nose only gains 4 feet of usable space.

The flat nose FE is far more maneuverable, turns much sharper. They don't ride well. Unloaded they suffer constant nose diving without air ride front.

Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."

Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
nat_ster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 01:55 PM   #12
Bus Nut
 
JakeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

That makes more sense. Still interesting info, though. I never really thought of the fact that you lose space with a dognose. I just liked the fact the engine was up out of the way .

I can see where it would affect the handling, having the riding position that far forward, and the tires further back. The doghouse seems to do ok, but with a big dip, the front will still sink down quite a bit before rebounding. I think I need to replace the shocks, though.
__________________
The journey is the destination...

Brutus
JakeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 07:24 PM   #13
Almost There
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NE Oregon, SW Idaho
Posts: 98
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: IH
Engine: 466
Rated Cap: 64
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains

Conventional front engine bus gives you a little more protection then a rear engine bus or a snub nose front engine bus.
If you have ever seen a bus that took a head on impact from another vehicle you would vote for a front engine conventional layout. That is what I hope my next bus will be! I'm bidding on an International front engine conventional with a 466 IH diesel engine with an Allison auto, a 66 passenger bus. Not too long, not too short- hopefully about right!
dburt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
driving in mountains with FE 5.9 cummins and 545 Alison auto bansil Mechanical and Drivetrains 16 04-14-2021 02:19 PM
advice- fishbowl with Allison 2 speed in the mountains nikoli Coach Conversion Projects 3 05-22-2014 10:15 PM
What tools do you recommend? kc_4_jc Conversion General Discussions 1 02-27-2011 09:33 PM
Can anyone recommend a good fridge? Diesel Dan Heating, Cooling and Appliances 3 07-14-2010 12:04 AM
engine overheating in mountains jeephauler Conversion General Discussions 3 08-15-2006 02:21 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.