|
02-26-2014, 10:41 AM
|
#1
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 38
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: MVP RE
Engine: Cummins 8.3
|
What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Hi,
We are looking for the perfect bus to buy, not easy.. Here are some of the specs we are looking for.
What bus would you recommend?
- We want to buy the bus in Texas or anywhere along the East Coast.
- The max length for an RV is 12m in Europe, so 39ft length would be perfect.
- The oldest year would be 1998, but if our budget allows it the newer the better.
- Our budget is a max of 6000$
- We want a bus without any rust on important parts
- As we are driving trough the snowy mountains I think a dog nose would be better, I read they our more noisy which I really don't mind, the dog nose looks safer. Length-wise inside do you know the difference?
- I would prefer storage space underneath the bus
- preferable an emergency exit in the back
- diesel
- the higher ceiling the better as Europeans are quite tall.
- best would be from in internationally well known company such as GMC, this would make import in Europe easier.
Do you know by any chance if you could put a double driver seat in the front? I've never seen it but it would be fun.
Thanks.
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 12:57 PM
|
#2
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Howdy --- you will find a very wide range of options & configurations out there as many buses are constructed to different school districts specs. You can either go directly through the districts (many still auction directly to anyone with the cash) or through a broker who buys in bulk lots from many different districts. There is an outfit here in the Houston area called 7K Bus Sales that does just that. I bought my first bus (a 40' Blue Bird All-American) from them years ago and they were great to deal with at the time. You can also send such brokers your specs and a willing price and they can shop it for you. That said, you should be able to find a good solid unit under $5K these days. I still see a bunch in the $3500-4000 range. A first person inspection is strongly recommended as condition is a big factor and highly variable. Also, if you can find a unit that comes with it's maintenance records (many do), it will be a real plus as far as evaluating what it has been through and what to expect will require service.
Best of luck with the hunt and let us know how it goes.
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 11:16 PM
|
#3
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Western Tennessee
Posts: 102
Year: 1985
Coachwork: Wayne Chaperone
Chassis: chevy
Engine: 350
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
I thought you guys were going to Europe to start your business!
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 11:19 PM
|
#4
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.
39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 09:38 AM
|
#5
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Year: 1990
Coachwork: Crown
Chassis: Super Coach II, 36 Ft. RE
Engine: Cat 3208T, MT643
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
With a rear engine bus you can mount the master bed right over the engine compartment. Conversely, with a front engine flat nose bus the engine takes up less space than with a dog nose, and the back end is even more versatile. You can have up to six bunks in the back (triples on each side), or a bathroom, or even a U-shaped kitchen. Down side is that the F/E flat nose is the noisiest driver of the three types.
And then there's the old Crowns with their mid ship under-floor engine. But you're looking for something newer. Don't rule them out though because a Crown will last longer than just about any other school bus.
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 09:52 AM
|
#6
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by nat_ster
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.
39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.
Nat
|
The biggest dog-nose I can find is a 72 pass, which is what mine is, but you can find 84 pass flat-noses. That would be only 2 rows of seating, though. So, yes...there is a difference, but I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'. That being said, though, a flat-nose RE would get my vote, just for driving pleasure, if nothing else. One other issue is that both styles of FE buses have a large overhang in the back that can make getting into and out of some places interesting (along with affecting the ride). RE buses have the rear axle back further, to support the weight of the engine, which eliminates that overhang.
__________________
The journey is the destination...
Brutus
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 06:46 PM
|
#7
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeC
Quote:
Originally Posted by nat_ster
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.
39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.
Nat
|
I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'.
|
That number was from memory last summer. I can go measure the difference between the ford b700 (dog nose) and the TC2000 (flat nose) in the morning. I will measure from the front bumper to the back of the drivers seat, and subtract the difference.
Also a ford will have a bit shorter nose than a international.
The flat noses that use DT466's have the front axle about a foot farther back making the front hang over longer.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 07:33 PM
|
#8
|
Almost There
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 89
Year: 1990
Coachwork: International/Thomas
Chassis: 3700
Engine: 7.3
Rated Cap: 73
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
http://www.renebates.com/
http://www.purplewave.com/
auction web sites
IMHO if you can get it directly from a school district and can get a few years of maintenance history you are more likely to get a quality bus
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 07:42 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
[quote=nat_ster]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeC
Quote:
Originally Posted by "nat_ster":2599er0m
Dog nose uses 9 feet of usable space.
39 - 9 = 30 feet of useful space.
Nat
|
I think 9' is not accurate. I can measure it tonight, but my snout for sure does not stick out 9'.
|
That number was from memory last summer. I can go measure the difference between the ford b700 (dog nose) and the TC2000 (flat nose) in the morning. I will measure from the front bumper to the back of the drivers seat, and subtract the difference.
Also a ford will have a bit shorter nose than a international.
The flat noses that use DT466's have the front axle about a foot farther back making the front hang over longer.
Nat[/quote:2599er0m]
Sweet. What length and what passenger were they both?
__________________
The journey is the destination...
Brutus
|
|
|
02-27-2014, 10:58 PM
|
#10
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 124
Year: 1999
Coachwork: ElDorado
Chassis: Chevy P30
Engine: 7.4 liter 454 Chevy
Rated Cap: 24
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Check out government auctions; city, state and federal.
I just got my current ride for 1200.
|
|
|
02-28-2014, 08:09 PM
|
#11
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
92 ford B700, 38 feet long, 72 passenger. Distance from front bumper to back of the drivers seat mounting plate is 8 feet.
92 TC2000, 32 feet long, 66 passenger. Distance from front bumper to back of the drivers seat mounting plate is 4 feet.
8 - 4 = 4
I was way off at 9 feet.
The flat nose only gains 4 feet of usable space.
The flat nose FE is far more maneuverable, turns much sharper. They don't ride well. Unloaded they suffer constant nose diving without air ride front.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 01:55 PM
|
#12
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 732
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Wayne
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 72
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
That makes more sense. Still interesting info, though. I never really thought of the fact that you lose space with a dognose. I just liked the fact the engine was up out of the way .
I can see where it would affect the handling, having the riding position that far forward, and the tires further back. The doghouse seems to do ok, but with a big dip, the front will still sink down quite a bit before rebounding. I think I need to replace the shocks, though.
__________________
The journey is the destination...
Brutus
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 07:24 PM
|
#13
|
Almost There
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NE Oregon, SW Idaho
Posts: 98
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: IH
Engine: 466
Rated Cap: 64
|
Re: What would you recommend? 39 ft and mountains
Conventional front engine bus gives you a little more protection then a rear engine bus or a snub nose front engine bus.
If you have ever seen a bus that took a head on impact from another vehicle you would vote for a front engine conventional layout. That is what I hope my next bus will be! I'm bidding on an International front engine conventional with a 466 IH diesel engine with an Allison auto, a 66 passenger bus. Not too long, not too short- hopefully about right!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|