Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-10-2018, 12:49 PM   #1
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 67
Year: 2005
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freightliner
Engine: Cat C7
Rated Cap: 77
Cummins 5.9 vs 8.3

I am looking for an 84 passenger rear engine bus. Is it worth waiting to find one with the 8.3 over the lesser powered 5.9? I'm guessing yes.

tororider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 01:50 PM   #2
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Greater Houston, Tx.
Posts: 589
IMHO...... YES, without a doubt.
1olfart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 01:53 PM   #3
Bus Nut
 
Dapplecreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: near Christiansburg VA
Posts: 692
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freightliner
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 44 or 66? 11 rows
I have a shorter bus than you're describing, and it has a 5.9. Mine is underpowered. With the increased weight you're describing, I believe it would be worth your while to wait for the larger engine.
Dapplecreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 01:56 PM   #4
Skoolie
 
Tryonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: GA
Posts: 129
Year: 1998
Coachwork: BlueBird
Chassis: TC2000 RE
Engine: 8.3 Cummins
Rated Cap: 78
For that size bus i would wait for the 8.3
__________________
Build Thread:> https://www.skoolie.net/forums/f11/1...yet-22358.html
Tryonis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 02:45 PM   #5
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 67
Year: 2005
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freightliner
Engine: Cat C7
Rated Cap: 77
What is it had a dt466?
tororider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 02:50 PM   #6
Skoolie
 
Tryonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: GA
Posts: 129
Year: 1998
Coachwork: BlueBird
Chassis: TC2000 RE
Engine: 8.3 Cummins
Rated Cap: 78
DT466 is a strong engine as well
__________________
Build Thread:> https://www.skoolie.net/forums/f11/1...yet-22358.html
Tryonis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 02:56 PM   #7
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 6,401
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American RE (A3RE)
Engine: Cummins ISC (8.3)
Rated Cap: 72
8.3 or DT466/530 all of the way!

I love the 5.9. I have owned several. Just not in a highway bound full size bus.

I have the 8.3 in my Bluebird and love it. It is a torque monster compared to the 5.9.
PNW_Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2018, 04:20 PM   #8
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: topeka kansas
Posts: 1,778
Year: 1954
Coachwork: wayne
Chassis: old f500- new 2005 f-450
Engine: cummins 12 valve
Rated Cap: 20? five rows of 4?
5.9....

I would say the 5.9 is a great choice for buses under 25 ft. Anything bigger than that is going to make best use of the 8.3...

a 5.9 is like about 360 cubic inches... the size of most v-8s in pick up trucks

8 liter engines are like having 450 cubic inches to 500 cubic inches... like engine found in one ton trucks, those huge cadillacs and stuff in the middle seventies....

I would say a those big 40 footers would do really well with 10 liter big rig type engines.......but that is out of the question for most.

I am swapping frames and the engine in my 1954 ford.... lots of work involved.

william
magnakansas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.