Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-14-2008, 04:02 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
FE vs. RE Buses

What are the pro's and con's of a flat nose puller bus vs. a pusher?
I'm looking at Amtrans & Thomas' with DTA466's & 5.9's with Allison's.

Neal

NSchlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 01:03 AM   #2
Bus Geek
 
Elliot Naess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clearlake, Northern California
Posts: 2,511
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Blue Bird
Chassis: TC-2000 Frt Eng, Tranny:MT643
Engine: 5,9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 84
Re: FE vs. RE Buses


Pushers are generally considered better buses. Better weight distribution, less noise up front, less fumes up front, shorter rear overhang (less scraping on the ground), easier to work on the engine. One possible drawback is weak air flow to the radiator, but I believe that any overheating problem is primarily a matter of cooling system maintenance.

The front engine design has one key advantage: You can have a door in the rear. That's the one reason I have mine. But a front engine will give you noise and fumes in the bus, and the engine is difficult to access. And you have to climb over the engine cover to get in and out of the driver's seat. And you have a drive shaft under the middle of the bus, taking up space you might want for water tanks and such. Front engine buses always have long rear overhangs, presumably to make the drive shaft as short as possible.

The engines you mention are both good, with the IH preferable. Allisons are OK, and pretty much the only game in town, unless you stumble across a manual tranny. The Allison AT545 is most common, but the MT643 is preferable. Typically, you will find the big tranny in the biggest buses.

Price and availability will be a factor. Those front engine flat fronts had their glory days a decade or two ago and are readily available. These days, most new school buses are pushers.

Does that help any?
__________________

Elliot Naess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 03:21 PM   #3
Bus Nut
 
phillbus914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 786
Re: FE vs. RE Buses

I believe that the rear engine buses ride better as well. Also with the shorter overhang comes a longer wheelbase which would make city driving a little more difficult. I think the trade off for a better/quieter ride would be worth it though.
__________________
My Old Bus :(
phillbus914 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 03:40 PM   #4
Bus Geek
 
Elliot Naess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clearlake, Northern California
Posts: 2,511
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Blue Bird
Chassis: TC-2000 Frt Eng, Tranny:MT643
Engine: 5,9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 84
Re: FE vs. RE Buses


Phillbus makes a couple of good points. Improved ride is actually what I had in mind when I said "better weight distribution", but my brain failed to spell it out properly.

The longer wheelbase of a pusher also helps the ride quality.

I suppose a longer wheelbase is a drawback to a novice bus driver. But so is a long rear overhang. It is remarkable easy to stike something with the rear overhang -- and we are not instinctively watching for that. So I recommend the longer wheelbase of a pusher -- if you don't need a "draw bridge" in the rear like I do. Just make sure you have good mirrors on the right, and practice using them.
__________________

Elliot Naess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2008, 08:58 PM   #5
Bus Nut
 
GoneCamping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 704
Re: FE vs. RE Buses

The rear engine Thomas doesn't really have a drawback to cornering, my Safe-T-Liner has an incredibly tight turning radius despite the long wheel base, and can do a complete 90º in about 15' of space.... I have been simply amazed at how well this bus can get into and out of tight spaces!!

The lack of a drive shaft though the middle of the bus has made it possible to add pass-thru storage under the middle of the bus, added grey & black tanks too. Enigine access is a breeze with that big door in the back!
__________________
*Cliff*

You just might be a Redneck if...
...your motor home used to be a school bus!
...Your living room has a steering wheel!
...Your home has brake lights

1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1989 Thomas Diesel Pusher (Cat 3208/Freightliner)
Chesapeake, Virginia
GoneCamping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 06:12 PM   #6
Mini-Skoolie
 
beekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southeastern PA, USA
Posts: 29
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000
Engine: 5.9
Re: FE vs. RE Buses

When bus shopping I tested a RE Thomas that was definitely faster, with a bigger motor, and drove smoother and quieter. The reason I went FE was size. I can barely get my 36ft TC2000 where I need it on my property. The 40ft RE bus was simply too big.
beekay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 01:59 PM   #7
Bus Nut
 
sportyrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mid Mo.
Posts: 872
Year: 1976
Coachwork: bluebird
Chassis: F33695
Engine: 427 chevy converted to 466
Rated Cap: 84
Re: FE vs. RE Buses

I think with the engine in the rear the added weight makes them move the rear wheels further back to put more weight on the front. the same way for the pullers, they have to have the overhang in the rear to keep excess weight off the front, to balance better. Rear engine would be the way to go if you didn't need a rear door to load bikes. My bike is over 8' long, too long to load from the side. sportyrick
sportyrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 12:46 AM   #8
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
I just test drove a RE and FE today, and tonight the RE is parked in my drive, even though the FE was the one I had originally set my sights on. It(the RE) was nicer to drive, Probably cuz there isn't a 4000# weight centered over the steering axle. Also MUCH quieter. Couldn't hold a conversation on the highway with a FE, though I would have defiantly upgraded the sound insulation. Most of the sound wasn't coming through the doghouse, but through the dash. That aside it's also like having a heater up there whether you want it or not. Both were Cummins 5.9's the RE was 12 valve, the FE a 24 valve. Even though the RE was a bigger bus at 14 row vs 12 row, it had more power and a top speed of 72 vs 62 in the FE. That doesn't mean the next one would be slower, probably just the gearing, but still, 62 wasn't going to cut it and didn't want to gamble that I could change that without spending a fortune.
robertv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 12:58 AM   #9
Bus Nut
 
Alan N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Gonvick MN
Posts: 339
Year: 1975
Chassis: Gillig
Engine: Cat 3208t/10 speed transmission
You made the right choice.
__________________
Remove hence to yonder place....
Alan N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 05:14 AM   #10
Bus Geek
 
EastCoastCB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,764
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
Dang man congrats.
You do realize this is an 11 year old thread?
EastCoastCB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 08:18 AM   #11
Bus Geek
 
brokedown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 3,056
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
Age is a social construct.
__________________
Keep up with us and our build!
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter
brokedown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 08:48 AM   #12
Bus Crazy
 
Drew Bru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Grayson County, VA
Posts: 1,428
Year: 1996
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by brokedown View Post
Age is a social construct.

Are.....are you Woody Allen?
__________________
Our Build: https://dazzlingbluebus.wordpress.com/
Drew Bru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 08:55 AM   #13
Bus Geek
 
brokedown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 3,056
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Bru View Post
Are.....are you Woody Allen?
Being Woody Allen is a social construct.
__________________
Keep up with us and our build!
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter
brokedown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 12:27 PM   #14
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB View Post
Dang man congrats.
You do realize this is an 11 year old thread?
Of course I do.
Now that you pointed it out. Lolz.
Still it's a relevant topic.
robertv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 01:19 PM   #15
Mini-Skoolie
 
Tomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 43
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC1000
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 24V
Social construct is a social construct.
Tomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 07:29 PM   #16
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: new hampshire
Posts: 20
Year: 2004
Coachwork: 35' Phantom
Chassis: Gillig
Engine: Cummins 280Hp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomas View Post
Social construct is a social construct.
Hard to argue with logic in this thread....
me2someday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2019, 08:08 PM   #17
Mini-Skoolie
 
solleks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 32
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466, AT545
Rated Cap: 8 windows
FE look better and theyre cheaper. And dont u like the mind numbing roar of a diesel engine at 2k+ rpm. I know i do.
solleks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 11:44 AM   #18
Mini-Skoolie
 
cleff413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Mt. Tremper, NY
Posts: 17
In a thread sometime last year, somebody mentioned dust being an issue in RE's when one is driving on dirt/gravel roads. If I remember correctly they mentioned an issue with the air filter clogging up while driving. If I weren't so lazy I could try to dig up that thread...
cleff413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 06:07 PM   #19
Bus Crazy
 
WIbluebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,259
Year: 2001
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American
Engine: 8.3 Cummins ISC
Rated Cap: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleff413 View Post
In a thread sometime last year, somebody mentioned dust being an issue in RE's when one is driving on dirt/gravel roads. If I remember correctly they mentioned an issue with the air filter clogging up while driving. If I weren't so lazy I could try to dig up that thread...

Different manufacturers place their intakes in different areas. Bluebird usually puts theirs inside the engine compartment while International usually has tall shafts going towards the roof of the bus.
WIbluebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 06:20 PM   #20
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
If you want to reroute it run some tubes from the rear engine air intake across the roof and utilize the holes left over from the front 8-way flashers as front inlets!
Sehnsucht is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Party Buses (In Buses In The News) lapeer20m Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions 4 07-03-2008 02:43 PM
Buses All ya would ever want to know frank-id Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions 0 09-02-2007 05:13 PM
MCI buses bus-bro Conversion General Discussions 3 08-17-2007 10:27 AM
Buses buses, ya wanna know about buses ??? frank-id Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions 0 10-19-2006 11:42 PM
Crown ??? Crown buses??? The best of all the school buses frank-id Conversion General Discussions 1 03-05-2006 03:30 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.