Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-23-2008, 07:31 AM   #1
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Re: Greetings!

Are you looking at a Type A (built on a 1 ton van chassis) or Type B (built on a short medium duty truck chassis) style bus? A Type A is going to get similar mileage to a 1 ton van (which you will likely need for the towing capacity). A Type B is going to get slightly better mileage than those of us with full size buses, but I don't think it's going to be as good as a Type A.

There are advantages and disadvantages to both. Obviously the mileage is one. A Type A also is going to be more easily serviced by the average automotive mechanic. The parts are also going to be easier to find in that any parts store should be able to get them. A Type B bus, on the other hand, will be more like a medium duty truck requiring a mechanic trained more on the larger vehicles. The parts are going to be just as readily available...you just won't necessarily find the on the shelf at Advance Auto.

A Type B is going to give you a little more interior space, but more impartanly it is going to be up to the task of hauling your load. A Type A is build on a pretty serious chassis, but will likely have a Dana 70, Dana 80, or 14 bolt Chevy rear end. Those things are tough as nails, but are still light truck rear ends and you're going to most likely have 16 inch style tires which meet their capacity much much sooner than the 19.5 or 22.5 style rims you'd likely find on a Type B bus. Just how much equipment do you have? I'm used to dealing with my old man's band's stuff. Their trailer is a skidsteer trailer with a box on it so it's already heavy. All their equipment is very vintage tube style stuff. If you pick up the old Bassman or Showman bottom you'd swear the speaker cab was built out of plate steel. Maybe you will have more reasonable solid state equipment.

Ok, I'll let the shortbusers take over from here...

BTW...I'm also from Minnesota, but I'm from way farther north than the two of you. Firearm is much closer to me, but hasn't been on in a while. Maybe you could try sending him an e-mail or something. He pulls his stock car with a Class A out of Duluth.

__________________
https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2008, 02:57 PM   #2
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 472
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: International
Engine: 7.3 diesel
Rated Cap: 14
Re: Greetings!

My only thoughts are a triple bunk might be a bit hard to do with the wheel hump on each side and the curved roof and have enough reasonable space for each person in the bunk. You might be better off having juststorage space near the top and as anyone here will tell you there is never enough storage space once you have it to the point were you use the bus.

If you really want the triple bunk and extra length maybe you should consider a used cube van or box truck. (perhaps one with a granny attic up front) They often have a longer box to play with and more height. You could take one of those and cut out the wall between the back and front and throw in a couple windows in the back.
wmah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 12:28 AM   #3
Skoolie
 
Ray_WA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 193
Year: 1991
Coachwork: BlueBird
Chassis: GMC
Engine: 6.2 liter diesel
Rated Cap: 24
Re: Greetings!

Quote:
Originally Posted by aimingforaurora
As long as each bed spot can have ~"18 of clearance, we should be just fine
Do yourself a favor. Construct something out of plywood and whatever you can find to make a bed on the floor with the plywood 18" above you. If that 18" includes the mattress take that into consideration. Then try sleeping under it for one night. Do this to see if you can actually sleep in the space you're planning on. I think you'll find that you need more space to sleep than just what you can physically crawl into.

I once converted an old van and I built in two beds. To save space the one in the rear went the width of the van, which was just over five feet. I'm 6'0". That isn't enough space to stretch out. I didn't think it'd matter since I sleep 95% of the time on my side with my knees bent, which brings me just under five feet. I measured.

The second bed was up above in the camper shell above the van. It was about 20" high when I started but a bit less after putting a foam mattress up there.

I was so proud of that van and drove it for months happy and content. Then I went camping in it. I could not sleep in either bed!!! The fact that I could NOT stretch out drove me nuts and I felt like I was in a box. In the upper bunk I tried to close my eyes and pretend I was in a normal bed but I could not escape the overwhelming feeling that I was sleeping in a coffin. It was a sleepless night and the next night I slept outside in a tent. I was happy the day I sold that van.

Quote:
Plus, we have a reputation to look after, a Short Bus is the bee's knees baby!
-Ryan
If it's got a van nose it ain't a bus.
__________________
Pack up your bus and bug out to the hills!
Ray_WA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 05:48 AM   #4
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 63
Re: Greetings!

Quote:
Originally Posted by aimingforaurora
I had considered that. Basically, We'll have to finalize the plan after we purchase the bus. The reason for going with the short bus is that it provides the most amount of space for a relatively reasonable gas mileage. I feel like a larger box-truck won't be very economical.

Let's also remember that when we're on tour, we usually have a hard floor at night, and NO good place to sleep in the van (when traveling 3+ hours a day). As long as each bed spot can have ~"18 of clearance, we should be just fine

If not, we'll have to figure something else out, but we can't afford to go any bigger than a short bus.

Plus, we have a reputation to look after, a Short Bus is the bee's knees baby!



-Ryan

hmm all my looking keeps showing that shorties are more expensive the the longer buses and close to the same mileage. you must be getting one for dirt cheep.
cucullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 06:56 AM   #5
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 63
Re: Greetings!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty
I'm with Ray on the space, at 18" I wouldn't be able to sleep on my side, or roll-over.

Smitty

or sit up you'd have to low crawl in and out of bed.
cucullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 12:39 PM   #6
Bus Crazy
 
timbuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: vancouver island bc
Posts: 1,028
Year: 1965
Coachwork: thomas
Chassis: chevy
Engine: 350
Re: Greetings!

So much for bringing the groupies back to the rack for the night
timbuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 01:38 PM   #7
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 63
Re: Greetings!

Quote:
Originally Posted by timbuk
So much for bringing the groupies back to the rack for the night

isn't that the point of a band bus?
cucullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 02:04 PM   #8
Bus Crazy
 
timbuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: vancouver island bc
Posts: 1,028
Year: 1965
Coachwork: thomas
Chassis: chevy
Engine: 350
Re: Greetings!

well then if your a good band you may want a bigger bus!or maybe just 1 big bed!
timbuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 09:27 PM   #9
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 472
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: International
Engine: 7.3 diesel
Rated Cap: 14
Re: Greetings!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray_WA

I once converted an old van and I built in two beds. To save space the one in the rear went the width of the van, which was just over five feet.

I have done something similar to this. I have a ford van and in the rear I have a bed elevated above the wheels and it measurements are about 65" X 65". Two of us in there sleep front to back with our heads in the back. Her feet don't hang off the bed mine will hang off the bed a little bit but I am comfortable and sleep good.
wmah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 10:37 PM   #10
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Re: Greetings!

Check out United Truck Body in Duluth. I bought my bus from them, as did Old Dog on this site. Tim is a decent enough guy to work with and my bus has been trouble free. I think he's a pretty straight talker. They have a fair number of TC2000's on the site right now. Don't pay too much attention to the prices as I think they tend to be a little lower than what's listed if you show some genuine interest.

Here's my thought...

A 72 passenger TC2K will give you ALL the space you need for decent sleeping AND travel arrangements. It will also give you space for all your equipment meaning you do not need to haul a trailer around which I would find much more convenient. On top of that it will likely cost less than a short bus and get nearly the same mileage thanks to a stupidly efficient B-series Cummins engine.
__________________
https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 12:04 PM   #11
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Re: Greetings!

From this it would appear that most people with a 5.9 Cummins are getting 10+ as long as they aren't trying to keep up with the Porsches out there. One with an MT643 tranmission and highway gears (4.56 or numerically lower) will do better than one with an AT545 tranny and lower (numerically higher) gearing.
__________________
https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 12:41 PM   #12
Mini-Skoolie
 
SkoolieDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 12
Year: 1985
Coachwork: Wayne/Lifeguard
Chassis: International
Engine: 345 c.i. International
Send a message via Yahoo to SkoolieDude
Re: Greetings!

Hello, I've been following your post and I agree that a type a bus built on a van chassis would be ideal in most situations. I would love to have one and convert it to 4 wheel drive for the ultimate camping rig. However i just came across on ebay what would probably be my ultimate bus compromise, in terms of length, size and capabilities. It is with some remorse that i post this link, as i will be very jealous of whoever is able to get this..sigh... but i have faith that it will be there again when i am ready for another project heres the ebay link, it ends on december 31..
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Other...8#ht_500wt_963

If i were in your position i would jump all over this! Good luck!
__________________
~Skooliedude~

1985 22' Wayne/lifeguard body, IHC chassis, 345ci, 4 speed
1985 Ford Ranger 4x4, 2.3l I-4 turbo diesel, 5 speed
1975 Mercedes 240D, I-4 non turbo diesel, 4 speed
1995 Volvo 850 Turbo, I-5
...And counting...
SkoolieDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 02:07 PM   #13
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Re: Greetings!

Now THAT is a cool rig. It should have short bus handling thanks to the stubby nose and short wheelbase, but is actually big enough to haul the equipment AND sleep comfortably. The lift in the back is super cool. Usually they are in front, but in back would make it ideal for loading equipment. It probably has a 6.9 or 7.3 engine in it. They are both decent enough engines and the fact that Ford used them in the pickups makes parts availability much better. Two tires will set you back some money though and it is a ways away. I'm not sure what a person could expect for mileage out of that rig, but it might be worth shooting the seller some questions.
__________________
https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 11:49 PM   #14
Mini-Skoolie
 
SkoolieDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 12
Year: 1985
Coachwork: Wayne/Lifeguard
Chassis: International
Engine: 345 c.i. International
Send a message via Yahoo to SkoolieDude
Re: Greetings!

I understand that money can be tight on a bands budget, but can you and your band sleep in your van rig? Is your 10mpg pulling a trailer? If your not sleeping in your van, you have to factor in sleeping expense into your total budget. Also, with a bus like the one from ebay, its large enough to fit a kitchen area with a small range and fridge, which means you can cut a little more off your travel expense with food you can bring.

I would imagine this rig may even have a cummins 5.9 in it. I'm not familiar with all the models of bus that was an option, or which chassis manufacturer used it, in which case you could probably squeeze 15mpgs out of, perhaps? I would imagine even if the bus had the 6.9/7.3 its more then 8mpg..I think maybe 11 or 12..anywaay...just more thoughts =^)
__________________
~Skooliedude~

1985 22' Wayne/lifeguard body, IHC chassis, 345ci, 4 speed
1985 Ford Ranger 4x4, 2.3l I-4 turbo diesel, 5 speed
1975 Mercedes 240D, I-4 non turbo diesel, 4 speed
1995 Volvo 850 Turbo, I-5
...And counting...
SkoolieDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.