|
04-21-2018, 05:59 PM
|
#1
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Wisconsin N.E.
Posts: 412
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Thomas
Engine: 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
|
What year
When did they start putting the smog crap in busses
Asking because I was offered an 04 is that going to have extra complications of smog stuff?
|
|
|
04-21-2018, 11:03 PM
|
#2
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Winlcok, WA
Posts: 2,233
|
Worse than an '01 but not nearly as bad as an '07.
|
|
|
04-21-2018, 11:16 PM
|
#3
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Wisconsin N.E.
Posts: 412
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Thomas
Engine: 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
|
So up to like 03 is the same and then it gets worse?
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 12:11 AM
|
#4
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Winlcok, WA
Posts: 2,233
|
Depending upon which engine we are talking about it could be okay or so-so. I personally like the '00 and older simply because they are less controlled with electronics. The advent of electronics did make things run more efficiently but it did so at the cost of much more complications.
Regardless, you want to stay away from buses with V-type engines as they generally do not perform as well as an inline engine.
You also want to stay with IC/IHC or Cummins engines. All of the other makes of engines are okay but they tend to have more problems and cost much more when it comes time to service or repair.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 12:23 AM
|
#5
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Wisconsin N.E.
Posts: 412
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Thomas
Engine: 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
|
As much as I've been reading I realize I know far to little about busses, I've worked on air ride and air brakes and a few clutches and engines in a truck shop but these are different beasts
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 07:04 AM
|
#6
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,764
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatthefak
When did they start putting the smog crap in busses
Asking because I was offered an 04 is that going to have extra complications of smog stuff?
|
My 04 has no emissions crap. What engine are you talking about here?
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 09:54 AM
|
#7
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB
My 04 has no emissions crap. What engine are you talking about here?
|
You don't have EGR?
The first emissions devices were EGR systems. They came along in 2004. Some 2003 buses will have them. They can cause issues but generally don't, and aren't too expensive to fix.
2007 was a big year. Many engines got DPF (Diesel Particulate Filters). This was a biggie and caused issues in school buses. They are horrendously expensive, and to be kept in working order they require that the engine mostly runs at operating temperature, and periodically go through a self-cleaning cycle. This is tough on a bus, especially in winter. It they get damaged they cost thousands to replace. Many buses were retro-fitted with them, and they can be deleted ... and sold for quite a bit.
At about the same time, manufacturers tried to make the base engine run more cleanly ... CAT introduced the C7 and later the ACERT (because the C7 wasn't very good). The abject failure of the ACERT engine led to CAT withdrawing from the school bus market.
In 2012 they added DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid). This is another thing you have to buy, although its cheap and everywhere. Jury is still out on whether or not it actually works properly. I mean, it works, but reliability isn't yet clear.
Bottom line here is that the best engines for our use broadly live in buses from around 1990 to 2003. Up to around 2006 is probably okay. Later than that and you are entering the market where you are competing with schools, churches, other organizations that can put the bus back into passenger service, and the prices rocket.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 12:20 PM
|
#8
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,764
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twigg
You don't have EGR?
The first emissions devices were EGR systems. They came along in 2004. Some 2003 buses will have them. They can cause issues but generally don't, and aren't too expensive to fix.
2007 was a big year. Many engines got DPF (Diesel Particulate Filters). This was a biggie and caused issues in school buses. They are horrendously expensive, and to be kept in working order they require that the engine mostly runs at operating temperature, and periodically go through a self-cleaning cycle. This is tough on a bus, especially in winter. It they get damaged they cost thousands to replace. Many buses were retro-fitted with them, and they can be deleted ... and sold for quite a bit.
At about the same time, manufacturers tried to make the base engine run more cleanly ... CAT introduced the C7 and later the ACERT (because the C7 wasn't very good). The abject failure of the ACERT engine led to CAT withdrawing from the school bus market.
In 2012 they added DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid). This is another thing you have to buy, although its cheap and everywhere. Jury is still out on whether or not it actually works properly. I mean, it works, but reliability isn't yet clear.
Bottom line here is that the best engines for our use broadly live in buses from around 1990 to 2003. Up to around 2006 is probably okay. Later than that and you are entering the market where you are competing with schools, churches, other organizations that can put the bus back into passenger service, and the prices rocket.
|
Nope no egr. Somehow I got a late 04' body with an 03' engine from the factory. Navistar went to the egr in 04 from all I can find.
After finding out how expensive DT466's can be to fix, I'd definitely avoid the EGR engines. The tech's told me to avoid anything after 04. That's the Navistar stuff. Navistar "quality" went way down with every tier of emmisions implemented.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 01:36 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Wisconsin N.E.
Posts: 412
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Thomas
Engine: 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
|
Twigg that was exactly what I was looking for, thank you!
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 02:56 PM
|
#10
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 829
Year: 1998
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: Dt466e
Rated Cap: 71
|
From what I understand, some 04 models don't have EGR. I believe the T444e was never made with emissions stuff, and some other models you can get lucky, from what I recall
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 03:06 PM
|
#11
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
I was educated on this by one of the more knowledgable bus dealers, that everything up through 04 is safe, and the electric gremlins started in the 05 and newer models. So my cutoff year is 04.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 03:14 PM
|
#12
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjhwick119
From what I understand, some 04 models don't have EGR. I believe the T444e was never made with emissions stuff, and some other models you can get lucky, from what I recall
|
Correct. The T444 never even had EGR fitted as far as I know.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 06:56 PM
|
#13
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
|
Just heard on NPR (National Public Radio)...
Cattle produce 86 times as much CO2 as all the fossil fuel engines in the world.
Get the EPA working on THAT one and leave my bus alone!
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 07:43 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Wisconsin N.E.
Posts: 412
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Thomas
Engine: 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango
Just heard on NPR (National Public Radio)...
Cattle produce 86 times as much CO2 as all the fossil fuel engines in the world.
Get the EPA working on THAT one and leave my bus alone!
|
Hahaha cow butt filters, don't say that to loud some wack job will try to make it a law.
|
|
|
04-22-2018, 09:02 PM
|
#15
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,764
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjhwick119
From what I understand, some 04 models don't have EGR. I believe the T444e was never made with emissions stuff, and some other models you can get lucky, from what I recall
|
At least with IC/Navistar that is the case.
|
|
|
04-23-2018, 07:45 PM
|
#16
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Pendleton Indiana
Posts: 348
Year: 2010
Coachwork: IC
Engine: MF DT466
Rated Cap: 81
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatthefak
Hahaha cow butt filters, don't say that to loud some wack job will try to make it a law.
|
In California they wanted to basically put a catalytic on the cow's back side. But I wont even go into Cali subject.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|