Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-22-2018, 01:45 PM   #1
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 11
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 5.9l Cummins ISB
2003 vs 2004 5.9 ISB?

Please Skool me...
Have found a bus that I think fits my needs. It's a 2004 Thomas EF 40 with a 5.9 ISB 205hp and an Allison 2000 transmission. I've read a lot on this amazingly informative forum about 2004 and later buses having numerous changes/issues due to emissions requirements. In some places it's mentioned that 2004-05 were the worst (but did they recover from that reputation later?). My question is this:
Is there a significant difference between 2003 and 2004 5.9 engines? I don't have the info from the label on the bus yet, but I'm going to look at the bus in a couple of days.

Any feedback from owners of 2004 5.9 ISBs as to reliability would be greatly appreciated.

I've read the posts about the 5.9 being "underpowered" for a full size bus (this is a mid-size), and the limitations in climbing power, etc. I'm aware of and accepting of those limitations. More concerned about long-term reliability of a 2004 model with this additional emissions "junk" on it.

Thanks!
2RideTheGlobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 01:20 AM   #2
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 33
Also wondering about the limitations of a 5.9 cumins
Bangbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 01:46 AM   #3
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 33
Dude .... it’s all friendly until we start bidding against eachother... I already got the plane ticket looked up 175$ from here to Vegas ;)
Bangbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 01:48 AM   #4
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 33
In all seriousness your riding the globe just to find your bus. Let me know what you think of it when you get there to check it out... I won’t bid past 3800
Bangbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 11:08 AM   #5
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 33
Man actually the more I read on the 5.9
I see that a lot of people are happy . Maybe they get better fuel economy and all.
But then again a 5.9 is a pickup truck engine ... I think the 2000 series Allison is a big improvement from what I read. But still has some issues and complications in needed to be repaired...
also I drive a 7.3 e350 and just thinking that has some power. It has a 4.10 rear end. I can go 100 if I wanted to and also cruising at 65 I get about 17 mpg.
I don’t know how I’d feel with a midsize bus not doing the same . I can load up 500 pounds and feel it just a bit on the motor.
I’m still trying to justify weather or not a 5.9 with a light load would be good . But then I go back to my van . It has a 7.3 it’s really to much I think but that in a bus would be perfect. Maybe even a dt446 or 444
Bangbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 12:00 PM   #6
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 10,050
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Carpenter
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DTA360 / MT643
Rated Cap: 7 Row Handicap
the T-444E is a 7.3, ford's version is simply a modified version of the T-444E.. the inline 6's defimitely seem to do better with low end torque.. I have a 444E in one bus and a DTA-360 in another bus. the DTA-360 is a small cousin (5.9 litre) of the DT-466. that bus is heavier than my 444e bus but it takes off quickly off the line but doesnt do well once its revs are above 1700 or so.. the 444E seems to do better when you get its revs up a bit. (you dont want to cruise a 444E at higher revs as MPG sux then. ).

-Christopher
cadillackid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 12:59 PM   #7
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadillackid View Post
the T-444E is a 7.3, ford's version is simply a modified version of the T-444E.. the inline 6's defimitely seem to do better with low end torque.. I have a 444E in one bus and a DTA-360 in another bus. the DTA-360 is a small cousin (5.9 litre) of the DT-466. that bus is heavier than my 444e bus but it takes off quickly off the line but doesnt do well once its revs are above 1700 or so.. the 444E seems to do better when you get its revs up a bit. (you dont want to cruise a 444E at higher revs as MPG sux then. ).

-Christopher

So the t444e is basically a 7.3
The dta is a international enegiem ? Which is a d466 little (5.9) brother?
So then a d466 is how many liters ?
Also what transmission do you have with it?
How would a Allison 2000 pair with a t444e ?

Also I think I would only use a mt 3060 with a dt466 ...
And so that dt360 you have is a 5.9 liter
Man I kinda think a Cummins 5.9 might be alright in a 30ft bus
Bangbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 01:16 PM   #8
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 10,050
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Carpenter
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DTA360 / MT643
Rated Cap: 7 Row Handicap
correct ford contracted international to build the 7.3 with some changes so ford could win at the consumer horsepower wars and sell competively.. the T-444E is the name international sold their version of the engine under.. some differences were ford used their own computers to be OBD-II compliant , the ford had an electric lift pump, navistar mechanical, ford used a thicker head gasket so they could run more RPMs.. this engine is a V-8



the DT466 is a 7.6 litre.. it is an inline 6 cylinder. it has had several revisions.. they were originally mechanical.. then in the mid 90s they began the 466E which is an electronically injected engine.. using a similar system to the 444E.. called HEUI. in 2004 these engines got EGR (ugh.. try to keep pre-2004)..


the DTA-360 is a 5.9 litre inline 6 all mechanical engine.. it has many of the same properties as the mechanical DT466s, just not as big.. they are great in shorter busses and are known to last forever (like the mechanical 466).. the DTA360s were made from 87-93


trasnsmissions. prior to model year 2000 the only overdrive automatic offered was the allison MD-3060. its a 6 speed double-overdrive electronic transmission.. I think they came out in the mid 90s? around the time the DT-466E was released.. in a school bus 6th gear is typically disabled.. the MD-3060 is a stout transmission..



in 2000 the allison 2000s and later 1000s were released.. as 5 speed single OD electronic transmissions..



mechanical transmissions. non overdrive - AT545 and MT-643 were out.. both 4 speed non overdrive autos.. the MT-643 features lockup converter and is a Lot heavier duty. . I just finished swapping an MT-643 into my bus with the DTA-360



the AT545 was the budget option offered.. great for strop N go school routes. but drive em on the highway towing or hauling-ass or fast in the mountains and you'll nuke it..



my experience - I blew up 2 AT545's in 2 different busses.. I road trip all across the eastern half of the country.. so I hit mountains but not rocky-style mountains.. so no more 545s for me.. except in my classic bus which wont be a major road-trip cruiser so I'll keep it in that one.



you could get allison 2000s on the T-444E and on the DT-466E.

the allison 1000 is basically the same as an allison 2000 however it has a taller Overdrive gearset in it.. I installed a built-up 1000 behind my 444E.. its fantastic.. I love it..



if h ad to choose for a DT466E I would choose an MD-3060 if available, but still very much accept a 2000 (likely a 2500 PTS in a school bus). both are great units.. I see the MD-3060 alot in the high horsepower Rear engine busses.. the allison 2000 wont handle the higjest HP rated DT-466E.


hope this helps..

-Christopher
cadillackid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 02:41 PM   #9
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 11
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 5.9l Cummins ISB
Cadillac --
Thanks for putting all of that in one post. The additional info (dates) on the and insight on the transmissions is helpful, and something I couldn't find before.

I looked at the Thomas EF40 with the 5.9 in it this morning. Unfortunately, the school district had a lot of wrong info in the auction (some of this I already knew just from looking at the photos). It's NOT a 78" headroom bus as they said...it's only 72", so my 73" head drags all the way up and down the aisle. They had four of these buses and none ran. Various states of disassembly. Also have two 84 passenger Thomas REs with the 8.3, but neither of those ran either. The transportation manager at the school district offered up (after I got there) that a company had come and bought ALL of their older buses except these six, which they didn't want because they tried to boost and start every bus and these six didn't make the cut. If I had known that (and the headroom info) before I made the trip, I would have passed.

It did give me an opportunity to take measurements and gather more data on this model Thomas, so I guess not a total loss. But I'm still putting the DT466 with the MD3060 at the top of my list. Not ruling out a 5.9 Cummins in a mid-size bus, but it's still #3 behind the DT466 and the 444E for me.
2RideTheGlobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 02:49 PM   #10
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 11
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 5.9l Cummins ISB
Bangbus:
The guy at the district in charge of selling the buses told me he had several of these Thomas EF40s and he would be happy if he got $2500 for each. Of the ones he has, the bus listed in the auction right now is the best. But keep in mind that it's not 78" high inside as stated, and it's not running, though the guy at the bus barn said he could boost it and it would start if I wanted. I didn't bother. I didn't see any physical evidence of mechanical problems on this bus, but some of the others were missing parts and had hoses disconnected.

I also have a 7.3 Ford in a F250, with 400k miles and going strong. I love it. But as Cadillac said, I think the DT466 inline 6 is a better motor with more low-end torque for something like a bus. And from everything I've read on here, it seems to be every bit as bulletproof as the 444E (7.3L). So as far as I'm concerned, I'm looking for a bus with a DT466 first, a T444E second, or a 5.9 Cummins third. I'm staying away from the Cats completely.

The RideTheGlobe thing is from my last round-the-world trip on 2 wheels. Will be doing that again in a few more years, but set on building a bus to tour North America first. You're in Houston? I'm in between Austin and San Antonio.
2RideTheGlobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.