Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-09-2006, 10:17 PM   #21
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Might I suggest a supercharger over a turbo? For your intended application it will be much better as the power will come on right away on the bottom end. I know you said you aren't worried about turbo lag since buses don't accelerate fast enough to care, but I think you'd be much happier with the low end power of a roots type supercharger. On top of that they tend to make more reliable or perhaps predictable power on the lower end of the boost spectrum. I'm all about using wasted heat energy (because it's heat, not exhaust velocity that turns a turbo...you wouldn't believe HOW many times I've had that argument with people), but each type of forced induction, whether it be turbo, roots supercharger, centrifugal supercharger, etc has its own special place in life. On top of that I think it might be less work to install and will be a good excuse to get that higher flowing intake
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 11:44 PM   #22
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_experience03
Might I suggest a supercharger over a turbo? For your intended application it will be much better as the power will come on right away on the bottom end. I know you said you aren't worried about turbo lag since buses don't accelerate fast enough to care, but I think you'd be much happier with the low end power of a roots type supercharger. On top of that they tend to make more reliable or perhaps predictable power on the lower end of the boost spectrum. I'm all about using wasted heat energy (because it's heat, not exhaust velocity that turns a turbo...you wouldn't believe HOW many times I've had that argument with people), but each type of forced induction, whether it be turbo, roots supercharger, centrifugal supercharger, etc has its own special place in life. On top of that I think it might be less work to install and will be a good excuse to get that higher flowing intake
The only reason why I thought turbo was it would be easier to run exhaust tubing than it would be to try and adapt the belt drive for a blower, the belt drives on the bus is nothing like you have seen on a other BB engine or truck engine even the water pump is a special setup/casting then you have the air compressor for the air brakes, it could be done but I see alot of money spent on all new pulleys and bunch of time making new brackets, if their was a bolt on kit I would be all over it
hoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 12:19 AM   #23
wtd
Bus Nut
 
wtd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California City, CA
Posts: 267
Year: 1982
Coachwork: Thomas TransitLiner
Quote:
Next argumentative topic: How can I hop up my 392 IHC without swapping,

I said, I don't want to swap it.

NO, I'm not swapping it out.

Can't we all just get along?
I don't know anything about that engine but you should really swap that for either a diesel (the one you have isn't a diesel is it?)or a crate of oranges or something ... I remember I had a Caddy once with a crate of oranges in it .. ran like a scalded - well, never mind ....
__________________
The Rolling Motel Room
Where DIY meets WTF
wtd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 12:23 AM   #24
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
You can spend money on pulleys or you can spend money on a wastegate, new exhuast manifold, etc I think either way forced induction is going to be expensive. How about an oil or ball driven supercharger?

Oh yeah...my bus turns 2600 rpm on the highway so I think a caddy would be fine in there....but that's for another thread, right?
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2006, 04:40 PM   #25
Skoolie
 
sportyrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mid Mo.
Posts: 241
Year: 1976
Coachwork: bluebird
Chassis: F33695
Engine: 427 chevy
Rated Cap: 84
366 vrs 427

366 is a smaller version, smaller valves, smaller combustion chamber, smaller bore, of a 427 tall deck motor. the extra height is used up by the extra piston ring, 4 rings verses 3 on cars, and they also have sodium filled exhaust valve stems to transfer the valve heat into the water jacket (big block chevys have wet valve guides, water directly on them) just like a tractor, the 366 is a small bore long stroke motor for more torque. the engine is de-tuned to make it ultra reliable so you can put you foot in it all day and it won't burn up. A regular car engine will burn up with your foot in it all day at maxium load. sorry boys they never made a production tall deck 454, so you are stuck with a car motor if you use it. A guy I know took a tall deck 427 and put a high lift cam in it to help his X Ryder truck get from point A to B faster and he had trouble beating the valve seats out from the pounding that the high lift cams had at sustained high RPM's. they have low lift cams in them for a reason, longevity. I have both, a 366 in my 2 ton truck and a 427 in my school bus, I love them both. get your exhaust opened up, a good stock Holley and good spark and that's about as good as it gets. any divergence from this shortens the live of your engine. a 366 crank, rods, flywheel, intake, water pump etc will fit in a 427 block and all you will need is the block, pistons and heads to jump up to more torque and HP. every mom and pop shop and farmer has worked on one and parts are everywhere (this series has been produced for 50 years), that's why they are still avilable in trucks, they are super reliable and have a reputation for such. this is one of the best-toughest gas engines ever produced. they even tried to put one in an airplane but it just wouldn't hold up to 90% power 100% of the time (remember you let off the throttle going down a hill and at stop lights) ya diesels have more power but the expense is 4 times a gas engine, do the math, by the time you put all those batteries, glow plugs, filters and such in one you lose all the price savings you gain from the xtra fuel milage, not even talking about rebuilds, I can rebuild that 427 on the side of the road for a grand, a major on a diesel is going to cost at least 5 grand and that's if you do it yourself, 12 grand at a shop. A service call on a diesel is $200, a little old gas engine is $35. these engines will go at least 200,000 I have even seen one in a ford truck (that's right, this guy had the right idea, a ford 700 commercial wrecker with a crate 427 Chevy in it) with 300,000 and all he ever did to it was put valve cover gaskets on it. As soon as Hillary Clinton becomes president she will lower the speed limit to 55 and you will be right there with the big boys anyway. You've got a good motor in your bus, just do a little to enhance it and it will last the life of that bus and not cost you an arm/leg to keep running.
Sporty Rick
sportyrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2006, 07:38 PM   #26
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 213
Thanks sportyrick that is the kinda info I was looking for, so I should try to improve on the breathing a little, I know their is plent of improvements to be made to the entire intake tract so I will be doing a dual inlet mod to the air filter to supply a little more air than the stock offers, it already has the factory headers that flow into a huge muffler that has a huge single discharge then runs to the back to exit by the rear bumper.

What are your thoughts on the mega squirt?

What about adding a turbo to over come the restrictive intake system (air filter to cylinder tract) run it at low boost like 1-2 PSI?

Thanks agian.
hoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2006, 09:26 PM   #27
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
Again...I have to say how cool that megasquirt system looks. If you can get it working you'll be my hero

Are you sure you have real headers or are they just the "ram's horn" manifolds that chevy used? Don't get me wrong...the ram's horn design is one of the best stock manifolds you're going to find but it still is no true header. True headers have equal length tubes so the volume in each primary tube is the same. On top of that, they try and make sure the exhaust moves at the same velocity. What this does is create small pulses of pressure inside the tube which will lower the pressure on the backside of the exhaust valve helping to scavenge the gases better for higher flow and cooler temps at the valve. Tri-Y (4-2-1) headers take this idea even further by using pulses from cylinders out of sequence to each other in the firing order to scavenge gases from each other. Tri-Y's give a huge torque boost down low where you need it making them very popular in offroad vehicles atleast.

As for the turbo overcoming the intake restrictions...Forced induction is meant to overcome volumetric inefficiencies so in a way it would work. However, your intake restrictions are going to create a lot of turbulence which will slow the intake charge down and inhibit high volumetric efficiencies. The closer to laminar flow you can get, the better. I think a turbo might help overcome the problems on the intake end, but if you're going to boost 1-2 psi, you might as well go to 5 psi. Most stock engines can take 5 psi safely, especially one like yours with forged internals already. Remember...forged parts are what they swap into race engines to help them hold up. The megasquirt looks cool because the literature says it can handle 21 psi of boost
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2006, 11:55 PM   #28
Bus Nut
 
captainkf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rossland BC, Canada
Posts: 433
Year: 1985
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: GMC
Engine: 366 propane
Rated Cap: 56
Hey Hoser. Keep us posted with what you end up doing. I also have a 366 that had a ground up re-build after I bought it. So I am very interested in what you find works.

A couple of questions.
1- Could the exhuast be run through two mufflers and then run out the sides in front of the back tires? I was thinking the shorter run would help it breath better. Or is it even worth it?

2- What kind of carb fit's this engine and does anyone have a good one kicking around that's acting like a paper weight? I am switching to dual fuel system (propane and gas).


Thanks a bunch all. -Richard
captainkf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 03:49 AM   #29
Bus Geek
 
the_experience03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
Send a message via MSN to the_experience03 Send a message via Yahoo to the_experience03
That shortere exhaust run might help a little as bends certainly add to head loss, but I don't think it's anything the seat of the pants dyno would feel.

As for carbs....I'm still a strong supporter of the Predator carb as a replacement if you choose to drift from factory. They will supply the right CFM for just about any engine because they are more of a metering block than a carb. On top of that, the throttle response is phenominal.
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3024/...09f20d39_m.jpg
Skooling it...one state at a time...
the_experience03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 09:07 AM   #30
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 213
the_experience03 they are true tube headers I will get some pics and send if you want to see them,these are not ram horns I have them on my 72 GMC so know what your talking about,
these are like the shorty headers you I am sure have seen, about half way down the fram rails they have the collector its not down at the oil pan level like most after market headers are they dump into 2" or greater" tubing and run back as duals to the inlet side of the muffler that is about 3' long and 12" in diameter the exit on the muffler looks like 4" tubing that runs to the bumper, the tubing mandrel bent so no volume losses on the trip back I doubt this is a restrictive system for the 366 given all the data I have been given on all its intake restrictions, I have seen plenty of factory exhaust systems and how restrictive they are by looking at this one I don't get that feeling just looking at it I think any motor head would agree its not your normal restrictive factory exhaust system how ever its not headers 1' of pipe and a straight through muffler either.



I have no plans to change or upgrade the exhaust system until it needs replaced unless someone can prove their are significant gains (50 ft lbs torque) I have replaced the exhaust on many of my other cars and trucks over the years with performance "better flowing" systems and the only gains I seen or felt including MPG was the less weight in my wallet, these "performance systems" might enhance something when included with other major mods but IMO offer NO bang for the buck.

Think I like about the mega squirt is the option to control the ignition I have to do some reading but think you could rig up a knock sensor and advance the timing for a longer burn (more power) until you got hits off the knock sensor then back it off again, on my trip with the 366 I never had any sounds of deto even when running 85 octane at 5000' on the same trip last year in my motor home (350 engine) I had a little deto but it was real sensitive to deto from day one.

On the boost thing I only want enough to help me up the tall hills and in the strong head winds I have seen a dial a boost setup where you can dial the boost from the drivers seat, not sure how it works but it would be nice to dial it up to say 5 psi like you indicate for the mountains and them long 5% 7 mile long grades then dial it back to 1psi for the down hill.

captainkf
Yes I think you could have it exit out the sides and I would like to do that has anybody else done this and not had any problems with exhaust gases getting in the cabin, the gains from the shorter exhaust system I am looking for in this type of mod would be from the weight reduction and the extra space under the bus no performance gains would be expected.

My current carb is a Holley something square bore I am not sure of the size but it seems to work well except for the jetting at higher elevations I want to cure this with a mega squirt and let the EFI lean out the mixture as required.

Thanks again guys for the input I will update as I make changes I now realize the only info I am likely to find on the 366 is maintenance and repair not any hop up or power enhancement experiences.


Anybody know the advertised HP and torque numbers for the 366 I know it dont really matter since I know I need more just wanted to know

hoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1956 Chevy Accordion Classifieds | Buy, Sell, Swap 3 08-20-2012 10:19 PM
50's Chevy Bus Accordion Skoolie Conversion Projects 10 08-14-2012 07:32 PM
'84 Chevy Bus Han Solo Short-Bus Conversion Projects 4 08-28-2011 04:16 PM
Chevy 366. What oil to use? herkyhawki Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions 1 08-22-2007 10:25 AM
43' Chevy behappystupi Classifieds | Buy, Sell, Swap 2 07-10-2007 06:24 PM

» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.