Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-21-2019, 01:42 PM   #1
Bus Crazy
 
Sleddgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: south east BC, close to the Canadian/US border
Posts: 1,420
Chassis: still looking for my bus
identification of bus model

can anyone identify the model of this bus for me? - the ad gives very little information about it other than 'Ford 7.3 automatic transmission run good' - - - he hasn't replied to my email yet
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bus ford.JPG (148.1 KB, 5 views)
Sleddgracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 02:42 PM   #2
Bus Nut
 
Jolly Roger bus 223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Swansboro,NC
Posts: 807
Year: 86
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Ford B700
Engine: 8.2
Rated Cap: 60 bodies
I think that's an early to mid 80's ford?
The 7.3 can be built to handle that double axle?
But what was that particular 7.3 specked to do from the organisation that ordered that bus?
I would think that 7.3 would be powered to at least 250 hp and a turbo with a double axle?
Built for a city route to haul heavy people verses you wanting hauling doggies and sleds.
If it meets your requirements in the area you live in?
I wouldn't be a fibreglass fan especiallydriving in the snow with all I enjoy my dogs/money makers My sled in the back?
A school bus body wise is bullet proofed to haul kids. Just gotta worry about the powertrain?
Jolly Roger bus 223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 02:55 PM   #3
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 4,378
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American RE (A3RE)
Engine: Cummins ISC (8.3)
Rated Cap: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Roger bus 223 View Post
I think that's an early to mid 80's ford?
The 7.3 can be built to handle that double axle?
But what was that particular 7.3 specked to do from the organisation that ordered that bus?
I would think that 7.3 would be powered to at least 250 hp and a turbo with a double axle?
Built for a city route to haul heavy people verses you wanting hauling doggies and sleds.
If it meets your requirements in the area you live in?
I wouldn't be a fibreglass fan especiallydriving in the snow with all I enjoy my dogs/money makers My sled in the back?
A school bus body wise is bullet proofed to haul kids. Just gotta worry about the powertrain?

If it is mid '80s it will have the IDI engine which is a very different motor than the later T444E or Powerstroke.

I don't think the IDI 7.3 was ever offered in a 250hp version.

I have never seen on rated for over 190 hp for the turbo version. If it is normally aspirated I think that the max factory hp was closer to 175 hp.
PNW_Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 03:06 PM   #4
Bus Crazy
 
Sleddgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: south east BC, close to the Canadian/US border
Posts: 1,420
Chassis: still looking for my bus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Roger bus 223 View Post
I think that's an early to mid 80's ford?
The 7.3 can be built to handle that double axle?
But what was that particular 7.3 specked to do from the organisation that ordered that bus?
I would think that 7.3 would be powered to at least 250 hp and a turbo with a double axle?
Built for a city route to haul heavy people verses you wanting hauling doggies and sleds.
If it meets your requirements in the area you live in?
I wouldn't be a fibreglass fan especiallydriving in the snow with all I enjoy my dogs/money makers My sled in the back?
A school bus body wise is bullet proofed to haul kids. Just gotta worry about the powertrain?

it's a 91, so non turbo - I'd like to identify the model so I can find out if the bogey wheels can be lifted when the going gets tough - I like the idea of the short wheel base for tight or slippery conditions, but if the bogeys can't be lifted, it's not going to work for me - the bogeys would make it legal to carry the kind of weight I might carry from time to time
Sleddgracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 03:10 PM   #5
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 4,378
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American RE (A3RE)
Engine: Cummins ISC (8.3)
Rated Cap: 72
That bus, with a non-turbo 7.3 IDI, is going to require a lot of patience when traveling. It won't be going anywhere fast.

They are a very reliable and economical engine but NOT a powerhouse by any stretch.
PNW_Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 03:12 PM   #6
Bus Crazy
 
Sleddgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: south east BC, close to the Canadian/US border
Posts: 1,420
Chassis: still looking for my bus
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW_Steve View Post
If it is mid '80s it will have the IDI engine which is a very different motor than the later T444E or Powerstroke.

I don't think the IDI 7.3 was ever offered in a 250hp version.

I have never seen on rated for over 190 hp for the turbo version. If it is normally aspirated I think that the max factory hp was closer to 175 hp.
it's a 91, so non turbo - and only 300 +++ ft lbs of torque, if I remember correctly - pretty wimpy really
Sleddgracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 03:26 PM   #7
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 4,378
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American RE (A3RE)
Engine: Cummins ISC (8.3)
Rated Cap: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleddgracer View Post
it's a 91, so non turbo - and only 300 +++ ft lbs of torque, if I remember correctly - pretty wimpy really
I drove a truck with one. It was slooooow but it had almost 400k miles on it and still ran good.
PNW_Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 03:28 PM   #8
Bus Crazy
 
Sleddgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: south east BC, close to the Canadian/US border
Posts: 1,420
Chassis: still looking for my bus
International/Navistar 7.3L IDI V-8 diesel
Valvetrain: 2 valves per cylinder, standard OHV, standard camshaft in block
Peak Horsepower: 185 hp @ 3,000 rpm (naturally aspirated) 190 hp @ 3,000 rpm (turbocharged)
Peak Torque: 338 lb-ft @ 1,400 rpm (naturally aspirated) 388 lb-ft @ 1,400 rpm (turbocharged)
Sleddgracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 05:39 PM   #9
Skoolie
 
farok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 168
Year: 2003
Chassis: Chevy cut-away 6-window shortie
Engine: 6.0L Gasser
I had a dually with the 6.9L IDI. (Funny enough it a crew cab with full bed, and so clocked in at 22' -- only 3 feet shorter than the bus I now have!) The truck with nothing in it was 6400 lbs. Loaded with about a ton of weight in the back, and towing another ton behind it, I got about 14mpg. Empty and no trailer I got about 14mpg. On the hills in western Virginia, it felt like I was doing 14mph loaded (in reality 30-40 on the steeper parts of the interstate, probably). Driving I-68 in West Virginia, we probably did get close to 14mph on at least one of the big hills.

The 7.3L IDI is to my knowledge just a larger-bored 6.9L. Plenty reliable as stated, but a true dog unless you're on the flatlands. I was never in a hurry when driving it, so it was fine for me. To be honest I wish I never sold it...

Chris
__________________
My build thread: http://www.skoolie.net/forums/f27/fi...ild-25804.html
farok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2019, 07:08 PM   #10
Bus Crazy
 
Sleddgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: south east BC, close to the Canadian/US border
Posts: 1,420
Chassis: still looking for my bus
Quote:
Originally Posted by farok View Post
I had a dually with the 6.9L IDI. (Funny enough it a crew cab with full bed, and so clocked in at 22' -- only 3 feet shorter than the bus I now have!) The truck with nothing in it was 6400 lbs. Loaded with about a ton of weight in the back, and towing another ton behind it, I got about 14mpg. Empty and no trailer I got about 14mpg. On the hills in western Virginia, it felt like I was doing 14mph loaded (in reality 30-40 on the steeper parts of the interstate, probably). Driving I-68 in West Virginia, we probably did get close to 14mph on at least one of the big hills.

The 7.3L IDI is to my knowledge just a larger-bored 6.9L. Plenty reliable as stated, but a true dog unless you're on the flatlands. I was never in a hurry when driving it, so it was fine for me. To be honest I wish I never sold it...

Chris
I like the looks of the bus and the price is right, I think, but I hate being the one holding up traffic
Sleddgracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.