Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-07-2017, 06:30 PM   #1
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Conneaut, Ohio
Posts: 180
Year: 2004
Chassis: International CE 300
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 71 passenger / 12 window
Looked at another bus today... as usual, more (different) questions!

2004 International CE300, DT466E, Allison trans (not sure which), 72pax 12 window, front-engine dog nose. ~155K miles, 7700 hours.

I'm attaching a picture of a "Spiracle" filter unit that I found attached to the engine. What the heck is this thing? Never heard of it before. (Mechanic said that it is no longer necessary and can be removed. He said it had to do with some old EPA regulation - it was a sort of air filter.)

Gearshift read RND421. My guess (let's see how much I've learned) is that that makes the transmission an AD2000 series. Correct?

Mechanic said that the buses in his stable (this was a school district in a rural area, but not TOO rural) have been returning 12-16 mpg regularly on stop-and-go runs, and the newer buses have hit as high as 22 mpg on longer trips. Those numbers seem incredible... but he swore up and down that the fuel reports showed those numbers. Claimed that even an "older" bus like this one should return 16-22 mpg highway at 55 mph. (He said it was governed to 67 mph or so.) Do you think this is even close to feasible?

The bus had rust underneath - I would call it "moderate". It was enough, at least, to require replacement of two unusually large horizontal crossmembers in the frame structure, though I saw no holes. I asked him what is usually the first thing to "go" when a bus gets too rusty... he said that the rust issues make it not worth their while to get it up to the point of being able to pass the state inspection, but since buses are "overbuilt" for safety's sake, it takes a lot to get them to rust out. He said "this bus should serve the purposes of someone like you for the next 25 years" and "you could remove every other rib from underneath and it would still be perfectly safe". (Bear in mind, the bus isn't even for sale yet, and the mechanic wouldn't be getting any money from the sale when it goes... so I don't see why he'd have incentive to lie to me.) Does this sound like a ludicrous pair of assertions or are they accurate?

And - what is the difference between "marine grade plywood" and the regular plywood (CDX) that you can buy at the lumber yard?
RomaniGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 06:31 PM   #2
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Conneaut, Ohio
Posts: 180
Year: 2004
Chassis: International CE 300
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 71 passenger / 12 window
Spiracle filter
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1107171203.jpg (182.4 KB, 14 views)
RomaniGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 06:41 PM   #3
Bus Geek
 
EastCoastCB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 18,494
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
Those mpg estimates sound egregiously optimistic. I'd guess 11 highway on a good day. But I could be wrong. Happens all the time!
__________________
.
Roll Your Own Build Thread
EastCoastCB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 07:18 PM   #4
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Conneaut, Ohio
Posts: 180
Year: 2004
Chassis: International CE 300
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 71 passenger / 12 window
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB View Post
Those mpg estimates sound egregiously optimistic. I'd guess 11 highway on a good day. But I could be wrong. Happens all the time!
That's what I thought. I asked the guy how those huge buses could get that mileage when my 29' diesel class C only did 11 on a good day. He said that buses are built to be efficient all the time, because they're constantly running... whereas motorhomes don't have to be built that well because they will only be used relatively sparingly.

I guess the only way to find out, would be to get a bus and drive it...
RomaniGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 07:39 PM   #5
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomaniGypsy View Post
That's what I thought. I asked the guy how those huge buses could get that mileage when my 29' diesel class C only did 11 on a good day. He said that buses are built to be efficient all the time, because they're constantly running... whereas motorhomes don't have to be built that well because they will only be used relatively sparingly.

I guess the only way to find out, would be to get a bus and drive it...
He hasn't a clue what he is talking about.

School buses suffer BECAUSE they are low-mileage vehicles that only run maybe 4 hours a day, for 180 days a year. They seem to average about 15k per year, with activity buses doing even less.

The medium trucks built on the same platform often run 10 to 14 hours a day covering upwards of 75k per year.
__________________
Steve Bracken

Build Thread
Twigg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 07:44 PM   #6
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Conneaut, Ohio
Posts: 180
Year: 2004
Chassis: International CE 300
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 71 passenger / 12 window
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twigg View Post
He hasn't a clue what he is talking about.

School buses suffer BECAUSE they are low-mileage vehicles that only run maybe 4 hours a day, for 180 days a year. They seem to average about 15k per year, with activity buses doing even less.

The medium trucks built on the same platform often run 10 to 14 hours a day covering upwards of 75k per year.
I guess it depends upon how they're run. Around here, it seems that there are no buses that are "activity buses", meaning that the buses from the main pool are used for activities.

But is he at least right in that they're "overbuilt"? And that they have to be efficient so that the district isn't spending a lot of money on fuel?
RomaniGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 07:59 PM   #7
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,627
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Saf-T-Liner MVP ER
Engine: Cummins 6CTA8.3 Mechanical MD3060
Rated Cap: 46 Coach Seats, 40 foot
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomaniGypsy View Post
I guess it depends upon how they're run. Around here, it seems that there are no buses that are "activity buses", meaning that the buses from the main pool are used for activities.

But is he at least right in that they're "overbuilt"? And that they have to be efficient so that the district isn't spending a lot of money on fuel?
They are built to federal standards for safety, transporting children.

The frames are immensely strong, way tougher than all except coach-built motorhomes.

The high flooring is deliberate. It means that most vehicles will submarine under the bus should they hit one. If I get up behind one of our school buses in the Taurus, my head is the same level as the kids feet.

Although the ribs in the sides are bolted to the floor, the hat-channel shape together with a steel and aluminum skin makes them tougher than every box truck, or Class A motorhome on the road. In a rollover, the standard demands that when turned back onto it's wheel, the vehicle still resembles a school bus. That is, the roof must not come down on the passengers.

It takes something big, heavy and moving very fast to seriously hurt any children not immediately in the area of the impact.

So no, they are not "over-built", they are built right.
__________________
Steve Bracken

Build Thread
Twigg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 08:07 PM   #8
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 224
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Engine: 8.3 Cummins, 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomaniGypsy View Post
I guess it depends upon how they're run. Around here, it seems that there are no buses that are "activity buses", meaning that the buses from the main pool are used for activities.

But is he at least right in that they're "overbuilt"? And that they have to be efficient so that the district isn't spending a lot of money on fuel?
Overbuilt compared to an RV I would say yes they are typically built stronger to keep kids safe, more efficient seems like a stretch honestly. Engine, transmission and gear ratio would all play a part in economy and I'm sure RV's are all trying to better economy as well.
Jacob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 08:56 PM   #9
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 11,863
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Carpenter
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DTA360 / MT643
Rated Cap: 7 Row Handicap
the spiracle is similar to my RACOR on the red bus.. it takes the draft tube draft and recycles it into the engine... and normally filters the oil out of the draft tube emissions and puts it back in the engine.. on older engines the draft tube can blow oil out.. esp at higher speeds. or engine loads.. I kept mine in place only because of the oil return.. I have no idea how much oil id blow out the draft tube.. but I do know the filter inside my RACOR unit is oily. so it does something..
-Christopher
cadillackid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 07:37 PM   #10
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Conneaut, Ohio
Posts: 180
Year: 2004
Chassis: International CE 300
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 71 passenger / 12 window
So I guess I'm left with two questions; one that went unanswered from my first lot and one more.

1) The gearshift pattern RND421 - is that an Allison AD2000 series?

2) This bus is going to be auctioned by "sealed bid". I'm not sure I like that because it means I could overpay, or lose completely. What would YOU bid for a bus meeting the description I just gave? (If you need more information, ask and I will provide what I can.)
RomaniGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.