School Bus Conversion Resources

School Bus Conversion Resources (http://www.skoolie.net/forums/)
-   Conversion General Discussions (http://www.skoolie.net/forums/f13/)
-   -   FE vs. RE Buses (http://www.skoolie.net/forums/f13/fe-vs-re-buses-2685.html)

NSchlee 03-14-2008 04:02 PM

FE vs. RE Buses
 
What are the pro's and con's of a flat nose puller bus vs. a pusher?
I'm looking at Amtrans & Thomas' with DTA466's & 5.9's with Allison's.

Neal

Elliot Naess 03-16-2008 01:03 AM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
:D
Pushers are generally considered better buses. Better weight distribution, less noise up front, less fumes up front, shorter rear overhang (less scraping on the ground), easier to work on the engine. One possible drawback is weak air flow to the radiator, but I believe that any overheating problem is primarily a matter of cooling system maintenance.

The front engine design has one key advantage: You can have a door in the rear. That's the one reason I have mine. But a front engine will give you noise and fumes in the bus, and the engine is difficult to access. And you have to climb over the engine cover to get in and out of the driver's seat. And you have a drive shaft under the middle of the bus, taking up space you might want for water tanks and such. Front engine buses always have long rear overhangs, presumably to make the drive shaft as short as possible.

The engines you mention are both good, with the IH preferable. Allisons are OK, and pretty much the only game in town, unless you stumble across a manual tranny. The Allison AT545 is most common, but the MT643 is preferable. Typically, you will find the big tranny in the biggest buses.

Price and availability will be a factor. Those front engine flat fronts had their glory days a decade or two ago and are readily available. These days, most new school buses are pushers.

Does that help any?
:D

phillbus914 03-16-2008 03:21 PM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
I believe that the rear engine buses ride better as well. Also with the shorter overhang comes a longer wheelbase which would make city driving a little more difficult. I think the trade off for a better/quieter ride would be worth it though.

Elliot Naess 03-16-2008 03:40 PM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
:D
Phillbus makes a couple of good points. Improved ride is actually what I had in mind when I said "better weight distribution", but my brain failed to spell it out properly.

The longer wheelbase of a pusher also helps the ride quality.

I suppose a longer wheelbase is a drawback to a novice bus driver. But so is a long rear overhang. It is remarkable easy to stike something with the rear overhang -- and we are not instinctively watching for that. So I recommend the longer wheelbase of a pusher -- if you don't need a "draw bridge" in the rear like I do. Just make sure you have good mirrors on the right, and practice using them.
:D

GoneCamping 03-19-2008 08:58 PM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
The rear engine Thomas doesn't really have a drawback to cornering, my Safe-T-Liner has an incredibly tight turning radius despite the long wheel base, and can do a complete 90 in about 15' of space.... I have been simply amazed at how well this bus can get into and out of tight spaces!!

The lack of a drive shaft though the middle of the bus has made it possible to add pass-thru storage under the middle of the bus, added grey & black tanks too. Enigine access is a breeze with that big door in the back!

beekay 03-20-2008 06:12 PM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
When bus shopping I tested a RE Thomas that was definitely faster, with a bigger motor, and drove smoother and quieter. The reason I went FE was size. I can barely get my 36ft TC2000 where I need it on my property. The 40ft RE bus was simply too big.

sportyrick 03-25-2008 01:59 PM

Re: FE vs. RE Buses
 
I think with the engine in the rear the added weight makes them move the rear wheels further back to put more weight on the front. the same way for the pullers, they have to have the overhang in the rear to keep excess weight off the front, to balance better. Rear engine would be the way to go if you didn't need a rear door to load bikes. My bike is over 8' long, too long to load from the side. sportyrick

robertv 03-15-2019 12:46 AM

I just test drove a RE and FE today, and tonight the RE is parked in my drive, even though the FE was the one I had originally set my sights on. It(the RE) was nicer to drive, Probably cuz there isn't a 4000# weight centered over the steering axle. Also MUCH quieter. Couldn't hold a conversation on the highway with a FE, though I would have defiantly upgraded the sound insulation. Most of the sound wasn't coming through the doghouse, but through the dash. That aside it's also like having a heater up there whether you want it or not. Both were Cummins 5.9's the RE was 12 valve, the FE a 24 valve. Even though the RE was a bigger bus at 14 row vs 12 row, it had more power and a top speed of 72 vs 62 in the FE. That doesn't mean the next one would be slower, probably just the gearing, but still, 62 wasn't going to cut it and didn't want to gamble that I could change that without spending a fortune.

Alan N 03-15-2019 12:58 AM

You made the right choice.

EastCoastCB 03-15-2019 05:14 AM

Dang man congrats.
You do realize this is an 11 year old thread?

brokedown 03-15-2019 08:18 AM

Age is a social construct.

Drew Bru 03-15-2019 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brokedown (Post 314594)
Age is a social construct.


Are.....are you Woody Allen?:eek:

brokedown 03-15-2019 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drew Bru (Post 314595)
Are.....are you Woody Allen?:eek:

Being Woody Allen is a social construct.

robertv 03-15-2019 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EastCoastCB (Post 314576)
Dang man congrats.
You do realize this is an 11 year old thread?

Of course I do.
Now that you pointed it out. Lolz.
Still it's a relevant topic.

Tomas 03-15-2019 01:19 PM

Social construct is a social construct.

me2someday 03-15-2019 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomas (Post 314623)
Social construct is a social construct.

Hard to argue with logic in this thread....:smile:

solleks 03-15-2019 08:08 PM

FE look better and theyre cheaper. And dont u like the mind numbing roar of a diesel engine at 2k+ rpm. I know i do.

cleff413 08-01-2019 11:44 AM

In a thread sometime last year, somebody mentioned dust being an issue in RE's when one is driving on dirt/gravel roads. If I remember correctly they mentioned an issue with the air filter clogging up while driving. If I weren't so lazy I could try to dig up that thread...

WIbluebird 08-01-2019 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cleff413 (Post 341563)
In a thread sometime last year, somebody mentioned dust being an issue in RE's when one is driving on dirt/gravel roads. If I remember correctly they mentioned an issue with the air filter clogging up while driving. If I weren't so lazy I could try to dig up that thread...


Different manufacturers place their intakes in different areas. Bluebird usually puts theirs inside the engine compartment while International usually has tall shafts going towards the roof of the bus.

Sehnsucht 08-01-2019 06:20 PM

If you want to reroute it run some tubes from the rear engine air intake across the roof and utilize the holes left over from the front 8-way flashers as front inlets!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.