 |
|
09-18-2019, 10:53 PM
|
#21
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,341
Year: 1990
Coachwork: Crown, integral. (With 2kW of tiltable solar)
Chassis: Crown Supercoach II (rear engine)
Engine: Detroit 6V92TAC, DDEC 2, Jake brake, Allison HT740
Rated Cap: 37,400 lbs GVWR
|
NFPA 1192 requires all propane storage on RVs to be between the front and rear wheels for obvious safety reasons. (That's why I wince when I see folk with propane cylinders bungied onto their back bumper or somewhere else equally daft.) Think of the worst-case scenario of a hard impact to the front, rear or sides, or your engine catching fire - would your propane still be OK?
John
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 10:53 PM
|
#22
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
@ ol trunt, and here all this time I thought skoolies weren't allowed in RV parks because so many people think most skoolies are really just mobile meth labs in disguise. Thanks for setting me straight.
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 11:23 PM
|
#23
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
@ Iceni John, does that section of NFPA 1192 apply to RE bus conversions as well? And do you have any idea who would be responsible for enforcing this regulation?
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 12:14 AM
|
#24
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1949
@ Iceni John, does that section of NFPA 1192 apply to RE bus conversions as well? And do you have any idea who would be responsible for enforcing this regulation?
|
It would apply to your conversion. It’s considered a motor home.
NFPA isn’t going to come get you in the middle of the night.
I think it’s worth pointing out that those codes were developed after years of crash test dummies making claims to their insurance companies. We already have a hard time getting insurance. Doesn’t it make sense to follow the codes?
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 12:23 AM
|
#25
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
I have been thinking of possibly putting propane between the engine and the back wheels. There's a lot of mass in that engine. I think it would be pretty safe. There's certainly more mass behind the axle of a rear engine than a front engine.
But if there is a regulation that says I shouldn't do that then I will most likely comply with the regulation just to avoid future hassles with authorities. It should be very easy to find out.
As I've said before I'm not a lawyer, but I have worked as a legal historian, and I know how to read the law. There will either be a specific clause or section exempting rear engine motorhomes from that restriction, or it will apply to them
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:03 AM
|
#26
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1949
I have been thinking of possibly putting propane between the engine and the back wheels. There's a lot of mass in that engine. I think it would be pretty safe. There's certainly more mass behind the axle of a rear engine than a front engine.
But if there is a regulation that says I shouldn't do that then I will most likely comply with the regulation just to avoid future hassles with authorities. It should be very easy to find out.
As I've said before I'm not a lawyer, but I have worked as a legal historian, and I know how to read the law. There will either be a specific clause or section exempting rear engine motorhomes from that restriction, or it will apply to them
|
You should read the codes. there is some allowance for putting it behind the rear wheels, but not on the bumper and not closer than 18” of exhaust without a baffle.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:11 AM
|
#27
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
Nfpa 1192 is free to read online. IDK if you can print or copy from it though. I tried to quote it here from my phone and couldn’t. Full size screen recommended
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:16 AM
|
#28
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
Yeah, I need to read the code. I think there should be enough room just behind the wheels, but I could put it on the front side of the axle if there's not. I want to build as much full-width storage as I can between the axles. That's really the only reason for wanting to put the propane behind the rear axle.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:38 AM
|
#29
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
I’ve really struggled to find the place on my shorty. My only saving grace is the low step.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:38 AM
|
#30
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
I tried to have a quick look at the code, but they want people to register, which involves giving them a form full of personal info. So I hit the red X and bailed.
If they make the regulations that inaccessible then it's no wonder some people ignore those regulations.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:39 AM
|
#31
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
Yeah, that's exactly why I didn't want a shortie. They're just too short.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 10:38 AM
|
#32
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1949
I tried to have a quick look at the code, but they want people to register, which involves giving them a form full of personal info. So I hit the red X and bailed.
If they make the regulations that inaccessible then it's no wonder some people ignore those regulations.
|
I forget all they asked, don’t they just want your name and company name? I did that a long time ago and the Prince of Nigeria still hasn’t found me.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 11:27 AM
|
#33
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 876
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Blue-Bird
Chassis: TC RE 3408
Engine: 5.9 Cummins 12V Mechanical/Allison MT643
Rated Cap: Blue-Bird says 72 pass.
|
I've been retired for several years, and don't have a company name. These outfits that want company names don't usually like retired people. In my experience they won't accept retired instead of a company name.
And I also don't want them having my email, so I will create a throw-away email, give them a bogus name and see what happens.
It irritates me that I have to waste time just to get a 5 minute read of the code to see what conditions have to be met to have propane tanks installed behind the rear axle considered safe in a RE. I personally think that organizations who develop and enforce rules should be responsibile for making sure the people who are expected to follow the rules know what the rules are.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 11:41 AM
|
#34
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,775
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1949
I've been retired for several years, and don't have a company name. These outfits that want company names don't usually like retired people. In my experience they won't accept retired instead of a company name.
And I also don't want them having my email, so I will create a throw-away email, give them a bogus name and see what happens.
It irritates me that I have to waste time just to get a 5 minute read of the code to see what conditions have to be met to have propane tanks installed behind the rear axle considered safe in a RE. I personally think that organizations who develop and enforce rules should be responsibile for making sure the people who are expected to follow the rules know what the rules are.
|
They’re better than ANSI who insist on selling their 16 page low voltage code book for $70.
I feel the same. I use a throwaway email address for stuff like that. I just searched my mail and they have never marketed me directly and I’m pretty sure indirectly.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|