|
|
08-21-2015, 03:50 PM
|
#1
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 16
Year: 1984
Coachwork: International Harvester
|
Safe to remove interior walls?
Hey I'm Lauren and I want to pick your brains. So I've been removing rivets from the interior of my bus so that I can remove the metal side panels, but my dad is really concerned that this will lead to the bus becoming deformed. He thinks that the piece of metal is vital for the structure and is meant to keep the bus from bending. I'd love to hear thoughts from all the bright, intelligent and experienced people logged in.
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 04:11 PM
|
#2
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
It won't deform anything. The interior panels are best removed and scrapped or repurposed. They trap the moisture that naturally builds on the metal panels.
The structural element of the interior skins is so minimal, its insignificant. Out with em!!!!!
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 04:33 PM
|
#3
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: EHT New Jersey
Posts: 1,134
Year: 2003
Coachwork: AmTran
Chassis: International 3000RE
Engine: T444E/AT545
Rated Cap: 75
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB
It won't deform anything. The interior panels are best removed and scrapped or repurposed. They trap the moisture that naturally builds on the metal panels.
The structural element of the interior skins is so minimal, its insignificant. Out with em!!!!!
|
What he said.
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 06:04 PM
|
#4
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
I should have taken pics of the condensation I saw this morning in my bus. The walls and ceilings were literally sweating bullets.
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 07:01 PM
|
#5
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 16
Year: 1984
Coachwork: International Harvester
|
Thanks guys!
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 07:58 PM
|
#6
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
You need to go do some reading in the build thread section.
If you had, you would not have asked that question.
We have the answer to every question in the build thread section.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
08-21-2015, 10:27 PM
|
#7
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 16
Year: 1984
Coachwork: International Harvester
|
Yeah sorry. I was reading them for a bit. I found a bunch on how to remove them, but not as much about if it was okay.
|
|
|
08-22-2015, 08:33 AM
|
#8
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 262
Year: 2003
Coachwork: International
Chassis: Amtran
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 71
|
Do not remove the side panels, the bus gremlins live in there, do not awaken them, they will cause muck havoc! Seriously, no problem go ahead and pull them down, it will allow you to inspect for leaks and mold and add new insulation.
__________________
"This is my ship...the Nebuchadnezzar, it's a hovercraft."
~Morpheus
|
|
|
08-22-2015, 11:17 AM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NUNYA
Posts: 4,236
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 3800
Engine: DT408, AT545
Rated Cap: 23 500 gvw
|
Quote:
Do not remove the side panels, the bus gremlins live in there, do not awaken them, they will cause muck havoc!
|
This is true.
|
|
|
08-22-2015, 11:30 AM
|
#10
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
|
There are varying opinions on this topic that have been tossed about in the past, so I might as well jump in and re-start this "lively" conversation.
Always fine to remove interior sheet metal, clean, re-insulate, whatever.
But...I was advised years ago by a retired Blue Bird engineer that it should go back in. The nature of the shell design on nearly all metal bodied buses relies on the box beam effect created by the two separate skins attached to the ribs inside & out. And no...this is not just for "roll over" protection...it was described to me as basic to the original design's structural integrity.
OK..I said it (again). Jump all over it. Or...ask a qualified structural engineer to compare the two design options.
I opted to keep both skins on my old 40' Bird and on the little Wayne I am working on now. Everyone here is also free to make whatever choice suits their fancy as well. I am not saying that my choice is the only "right" one, just passing on what I considered to be information worth considering from a reliable source. What I am proposing is that you try to get as much qualified info as possible to base your choices on. Especially as regards the fundamental structure.
|
|
|
08-22-2015, 01:05 PM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NUNYA
Posts: 4,236
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 3800
Engine: DT408, AT545
Rated Cap: 23 500 gvw
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango
There are varying opinions on this topic that have been tossed about in the past, so I might as well jump in and re-start this "lively" conversation.
Always fine to remove interior sheet metal, clean, re-insulate, whatever.
But...I was advised years ago by a retired Blue Bird engineer that it should go back in. The nature of the shell design on nearly all metal bodied buses relies on the box beam effect created by the two separate skins attached to the ribs inside & out. And no...this is not just for "roll over" protection...it was described to me as basic to the original design's structural integrity.
OK..I said it (again). Jump all over it. Or...ask a qualified structural engineer to compare the two design options.
I opted to keep both skins on my old 40' Bird and on the little Wayne I am working on now. Everyone here is also free to make whatever choice suits their fancy as well. I am not saying that my choice is the only "right" one, just passing on what I considered to be information worth considering from a reliable source. What I am proposing is that you try to get as much qualified info as possible to base your choices on. Especially as regards the fundamental structure.
|
I agree with this...and the gremlins.
|
|
|
08-22-2015, 08:41 PM
|
#12
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
We have rolled full size 66 passenger buses down a hill with the excavator when cleaning up a spot for the crusher.
Two out of 5 had no interior panels. However, the two without didn't deform any more than the three that still had the interior panels.
A few dents, and none of the 5 where still square inside. That was the extent of the damage.
That's what I based my dissension on.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 10:13 AM
|
#13
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 16
Year: 1984
Coachwork: International Harvester
|
Alright so what it sounds like from what I've read here and on other sites is that the interior skins were designed to help reinforce the bus and make it stronger, but they aren't vital. A lot of people have removed the skins and experienced no problems as long as they make nice with the gremlins.
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 01:41 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennythebus
Alright so what it sounds like from what I've read here and on other sites is that the interior skins were designed to help reinforce the bus and make it stronger, but they aren't vital. A lot of people have removed the skins and experienced no problems as long as they make nice with the gremlins.
|
What would make you feel better- mold and funk hidden in your hot or cold (depending on the weather) metal interior walls, or .0000000000000001% less crash worthiness?
Sounds like you're playing it smart... asking questions FIRST! just weigh all your options and consider it all and then make an informed personal decision.
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 02:28 PM
|
#15
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Posts: 1,796
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: B3800 Short bus
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nat_ster
We have rolled full size 66 passenger buses down a hill with the excavator when cleaning up a spot for the crusher.
Two out of 5 had no interior panels. However, the two without didn't deform any more than the three that still had the interior panels.
A few dents, and none of the 5 where still square inside. That was the extent of the damage.
That's what I based my dissension on.
Nat
|
Best job ever... I would pay for tickets to watch that!
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 03:17 PM
|
#16
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
I hate buses getting crushed. They crushed just over 100 when I first stared working for them.
It feels like a waste of good parts.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 06:44 PM
|
#17
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 16
Year: 1984
Coachwork: International Harvester
|
So my dad is still upset about this. He said that the outside rivets will loosen more quickly without the interior skins. Did anyone experience that?
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 07:06 PM
|
#18
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
I drive down some crappy roads and haven't noticed and rivets loosening. They're totally unrelated.
Just speaking from my personal experience but skoolies and parental approval RARELY go hand in hand in any regard.
|
|
|
08-26-2015, 01:00 AM
|
#19
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stony Plain Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,937
Year: 1992
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: 190hp 5.9 Cummins
Rated Cap: 72
|
Show your dad this site.
Show him the input of all the people with Real bus experience. Not just a Opinion.
There are far to many of us here that have removed the interior skin with no negative effects.
Nat
__________________
"Don't argue with stupid people. They will just drag you down to their level, and beat you up with experience."
Patently waiting for the apocalypses to level the playing field in this physiological game of life commonly known as Civilization
|
|
|
08-26-2015, 08:00 AM
|
#20
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 313
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Blue Bird
Chassis: TC/2000
Engine: Cummins 5.9TA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennythebus
So my dad is still upset about this. He said that the outside rivets will loosen more quickly without the interior skins. Did anyone experience that?
|
I love my father-in-law, and when I bought the bus we were working on it together a lot. But I quit working on it with him a while ago. He's got a lot of opinions and they're slowing me down. People on this forum have opinions too. Don't let them slow you down either.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|