|
02-14-2020, 07:06 AM
|
#1
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Someone buy this!
Mechanical, low miles. Does have 8000 hours, but still... a killer deal at the current price.
https://www.publicsurplus.com/sms/au...ew?auc=2526670
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 11:32 AM
|
#2
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,259
Year: 2001
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: All American
Engine: 8.3 Cummins ISC
Rated Cap: 75
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB
|
can't even tell that motor that is. If its Cat it's probably a 3116 which some argue is problem prone and not as good as the later 3126.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 11:51 AM
|
#3
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIbluebird
can't even tell that motor that is. If its Cat it's probably a 3116 which some argue is problem prone and not as good as the later 3126.
|
At that price I'd take it if I had a way to get it home. 3116 is alright, but you do have to know how to take care of one.
All mechanical though, so that's good.
Only at $1600 currently.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 11:56 AM
|
#4
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 578
Year: 2001
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: MVP ER
Engine: CAT 3126
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIbluebird
can't even tell that motor that is. If its Cat it's probably a 3116 which some argue is problem prone and not as good as the later 3126.
|
Ad claims it's a 3506, I'm not having much success googling the serial number on the data plate, but the horsepower per the data plate is 250 hp.
Actually I think it's an 8.3, I thought it say 6CYA for the model number but when I googled that 6CTA came up, which is the Cummins 8.3 Looking again it looks like 6CTA on the data plate.
It looks tan, like an old Cummins
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 12:25 PM
|
#5
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
|
Arizona usually has some nice clean vehicles, I like the white paint. If it was closer to home I might put a bid on it.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 01:02 PM
|
#6
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
|
Cummins 8.3L and Allison MT643, already painted, seems like a good deal.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 05:31 PM
|
#7
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
Cummins 8.3L and Allison MT643, already painted, seems like a good deal.
|
No one bites when its a GOOD one.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 07:37 PM
|
#8
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 34
|
Vin indicates:
Rear engine
Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER Transit
School 78" headroom
airbrakes
Engine serial is a Cummins 8.3
My guess with the transit designation, underbody storage and overhead racks would be an activity bus probably geared for highway travel
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 08:20 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Grayson County, VA
Posts: 1,438
Year: 1996
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466
Rated Cap: 65
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB
No one bites when its a GOOD one.
|
You watch a lot of auctions, what's your guess on how much it'll sell for? 40 minutes left and it's under $1625 right now.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 08:30 PM
|
#10
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Bru
You watch a lot of auctions, what's your guess on how much it'll sell for? 40 minutes left and it's under $1625 right now.
|
I bet it stays right where its at. No one wants a cheap bus. They want a ten thousand dollar bus.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 08:43 PM
|
#11
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,349
Year: 1990
Coachwork: Thomas 4 window w/lift
Chassis: G30~Chevy cutaway
Engine: 5.7/350 Chevy Vortec
Rated Cap: Just me and my "stuff"?
|
Wonder why there are no service records available for it?
Maybe that's scaring away the buyers, beside it's age???
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 08:47 PM
|
#12
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by want2camp
Vin indicates:
Rear engine
Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER Transit
School 78" headroom
airbrakes
Engine serial is a Cummins 8.3
My guess with the transit designation, underbody storage and overhead racks would be an activity bus probably geared for highway travel
|
I think the Transit terminology only designated it was a rear engine and the pics don't indicate underbody storage. Additional, although it has had some lights and markings removed and a paint job, it was clearly originally a yellow school bus. The rear lights remain plus the light control overhead indicators. Also the lack of air conditioning suggests built for student transportation then repurposed later. None of this is a drawback, just clarifying what I see examining the pics provided. I would also venture to guess it is geared for highway speeds otherwise why bother getting the 8.3L engine.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 08:54 PM
|
#13
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
|
This would be ideal for me, sadly I'm not in a position to invest in one right now. My bus dream is in hold until at least mid-2021.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 09:04 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
|
Looks like it went for $2,350
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 09:07 PM
|
#15
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peteg59
Wonder why there are no service records available for it?
Maybe that's scaring away the buyers, beside it's age???
|
Maybe they just don't have the records. Some agency likely turned it in to some other agency.
|
|
|
02-14-2020, 09:13 PM
|
#16
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 756
Year: 2003
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000
Engine: Cummins 5.9 24v
Rated Cap: 54 passenger
|
LOL you had me watching this auction even though I had no interest in buying a second bus.
Led me to these though. How much would one pay for 6V 220ah batteries with no idea what condition theyre in?
|
|
|
02-15-2020, 06:38 PM
|
#17
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
I think the Transit terminology only designated it was a rear engine and the pics don't indicate underbody storage. Additional, although it has had some lights and markings removed and a paint job, it was clearly originally a yellow school bus. The rear lights remain plus the light control overhead indicators. Also the lack of air conditioning suggests built for student transportation then repurposed later. None of this is a drawback, just clarifying what I see examining the pics provided. I would also venture to guess it is geared for highway speeds otherwise why bother getting the 8.3L engine.
|
Actually a rear engine in a school bus does not automatically make it a transit bus. Thomas has several bus models indicated by the fourth digit in the VIN. In the case of this bus VIN 1t75t4b23p113824 the 5 indicates Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER Transit. If it had been a H it would have been a plain Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER. The first 3 digits indicate front or rear engine. In this case 1T7 is rear engine. I don't have access to the listing right now but if I'm not mistaken there were 2 underbody compartments on the passenger side. And I agree that the racks could have been installed later in the buses life but chances are with the bus being ordered as a transit version of the MVP-ER I would say it was a safe bet they were installed at the factory. When I drove school buses the school district had special order buses they used as spares or field trip buses that were geared better for highway speeds and had storage compartments for track, football or ski gear etc.
|
|
|
02-15-2020, 09:30 PM
|
#18
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Eustis FLORIDA
Posts: 23,829
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freighliner FS65
Engine: Cat 3126
Rated Cap: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by want2camp
Actually a rear engine in a school bus does not automatically make it a transit bus. Thomas has several bus models indicated by the fourth digit in the VIN. In the case of this bus VIN 1t75t4b23p113824 the 5 indicates Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER Transit. If it had been a H it would have been a plain Saf-T-Liner MVP-ER. The first 3 digits indicate front or rear engine. In this case 1T7 is rear engine. I don't have access to the listing right now but if I'm not mistaken there were 2 underbody compartments on the passenger side. And I agree that the racks could have been installed later in the buses life but chances are with the bus being ordered as a transit version of the MVP-ER I would say it was a safe bet they were installed at the factory. When I drove school buses the school district had special order buses they used as spares or field trip buses that were geared better for highway speeds and had storage compartments for track, football or ski gear etc.
|
Any "flat" front type bus is called "transit" generically.
|
|
|
02-16-2020, 05:44 PM
|
#19
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastCB
Any "flat" front type bus is called "transit" generically.
|
While you and others may refer to flat front buses generically as "transit" that is not what Thomas refers to all of them as. I am stating what the VIN decoded the bus in question as being. Sehnsucht then said rear engine buses where transit style buses which is not true as I pointed out in my second above post since Thomas offers the MVP-ER or the MVP-ER-Transit and you are now putting in your 2 cents that flat front buses are generically referred to as transit which is subjective and again not what Thomas says. I have never heard anyone refer to a flat front, front engine or rear engine SCHOOL BUS as a transit bus. I have however seen the Thomas MVP-ER-Transit buses actually used as transit buses in smaller counties for public transportation and also the Church of Scientology to move their people around the city to their different buildings.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|