|
03-04-2004, 08:04 AM
|
#1
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
|
Skoolie With Stacks?
Would it work?
What r the + and - Of It
__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 10:13 AM
|
#2
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: near flint michigan
Posts: 2,657
|
I'v also considered stacks at some point in my conversion. The problem is..........where to put em? Would it be attractive to have the pipes run on the outside of the bus all the way to the top??
You'd also have to change your exhause from single to double pipes
I think it would be awsome to have stacks with the little flipper on top...the one that at idle bounces open and closed with a ding ding ding sound.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (who will watch the watchmen?)
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 11:00 AM
|
#3
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
|
Stacks
Or mabey 8 Stacks coming out of the Hood or 4 off to each the side of the hood.
Is that hard on gas Consumption?
__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 12:08 PM
|
#4
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,839
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapeer20m
You'd also have to change your exhause from single to double pipes
|
That's not a big deal, I was thinking of putting headers on my 345. But then I would just want an intake manifold for a 4bbl carb to go with them
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 11:53 PM
|
#5
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 448
|
You would have to be careful where you place them, the exhaust gases could enter the cabin through a window or a vent. It would look like crap though having the stacks at the back.
|
|
|
03-05-2004, 09:58 AM
|
#6
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
|
Stacks
But if you put a bigger intake- Thats more gas Comsumption, Right?
Note: I just want the Room Under the bus For Storage-Tanks-
Things like that
__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
|
|
|
07-29-2004, 04:45 PM
|
#7
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Elk River, MN
Posts: 113
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: Chevy C-60
Engine: 8.2L Turbo Detroit Diesel
Rated Cap: 77
|
You mean something like this?
(click for larger version)
Not mine but it looks cool. Chrome stacks are not cheap.
Chad
http://trx.punknet.org/geeklog/public_h ... Conversion
|
|
|
07-29-2004, 11:49 PM
|
#8
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 243
|
4 barrel carb does not necessarily mean greater fuel consumption. The second two barrels only open under hard acceleration. Nice to have if you need extra power for hills or passing, but a heavy foot could drop your fuel mileage. Under normal driving conditions your mileage should stay pretty much the same.
Also anything chrome is expensive.
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 02:14 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,839
|
I watched Herbie Goes Bananas the other night and the school bus they are using to get around Panama(?) actually has stacks coming up the rear of the bus, one on each side. In fact all of the school buses in the town where they got the one they were driving had stacks like that.
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 08:34 PM
|
#10
|
Almost There
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 92
|
stacks
I want to put dual stacks out the passenger side of the bus just behind the door. Im thinking 2 5" elbows
__________________
In search of Bus #2
(Sold)1989 Chevy Thomas 8.2 Detroit Allison AT545 Custom 3rd door added in back.
GM Service Tech
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 11:58 PM
|
#11
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,009
Year: 1993
Coachwork: Ward Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/MT643
Rated Cap: 77
|
My Holley Economaster 4bbl gives much better mileage than the old Motorcraft 2bbls that most Fords I see use. A Rochester Q-jet or Carter Thermo-Quad will be just as good (maybe better). My friend's International Travelall saw a 2MPG boost (from 9-10 to 11-12) when he replaced his 392's old 2bbl carb with a Quadrajet.
__________________
Jarlaxle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optimism is a mental disorder.
|
|
|
12-04-2004, 12:22 AM
|
#12
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 243
|
Since Edelbrock bought the Quadrajet line they now make compatable manifolds for most manufactureres (Ford, Dodge, etc...) so you can bolt one right on. I was thinking of doing this on my Mustang since I use Quadrajets on my stock cars and love them. Don't believe it when people say they're junk cause they got a bad wrap in the '60 when GM put crappy quality cams in their vehicles and the carb got blamed when they wouldn't run smooth. Lobes would wear right off the cams and flatted out which caused a serious lack of power and rough running. Probably more than all of you needed to know I bet. Sometimes I run on. ;)
|
|
|
12-04-2004, 11:53 AM
|
#13
|
Almost There
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fir Island, Washington
Posts: 83
|
Mileage
Hi There , My limited experience with gas mileage is that dual exhaust always provides better mileage. Bear in mind that good or great mileage is directly related to the pressure applied to the accelerator pedal by the right foot. Better breathing by the engine relates to better mileage. Some where in one of these forums is an article or two that show a tremendous increase in mileage by smoothing out the under side of the bus. That is going to be my approach. A huge amount of drag comes from the air going under your bus.
Later, J.B.
|
|
|
12-04-2004, 02:09 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington (USA)
Posts: 465
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trx
You mean something like this?
|
Hey, that's a good looking rig! Thanks for the link.
It sorta looks like they'd be a little hard to see past and perhpas infringe on seeing the side mirrors. I suppose this is something you just have to do a trial fit on.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|