Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-04-2004, 08:04 AM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
Send a message via MSN to Mat7103
Skoolie With Stacks?

Would it work?

What r the + and - Of It

__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
Mat7103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 10:13 AM   #2
Bus Geek
 
lapeer20m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: near flint michigan
Posts: 2,657
I'v also considered stacks at some point in my conversion. The problem is..........where to put em? Would it be attractive to have the pipes run on the outside of the bus all the way to the top??



You'd also have to change your exhause from single to double pipes



I think it would be awsome to have stacks with the little flipper on top...the one that at idle bounces open and closed with a ding ding ding sound.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (who will watch the watchmen?)
lapeer20m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 11:00 AM   #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
Send a message via MSN to Mat7103
Stacks

Or mabey 8 Stacks coming out of the Hood or 4 off to each the side of the hood.



Is that hard on gas Consumption?
__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
Mat7103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 12:08 PM   #4
Bus Crazy
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,839
Send a message via AIM to Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapeer20m
You'd also have to change your exhause from single to double pipes


That's not a big deal, I was thinking of putting headers on my 345. But then I would just want an intake manifold for a 4bbl carb to go with them
__________________
View my 1972 Ward: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
View my 1986 Blue Bird: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
View my 1960 GMC: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 11:53 PM   #5
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 448
You would have to be careful where you place them, the exhaust gases could enter the cabin through a window or a vent. It would look like crap though having the stacks at the back.
busone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2004, 09:58 AM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilton, Wi
Posts: 7
Send a message via MSN to Mat7103
Stacks

But if you put a bigger intake- Thats more gas Comsumption, Right?

Note: I just want the Room Under the bus For Storage-Tanks-

Things like that
__________________
1985 Chevy Skoolie-366 Big Block-66 Pass
Mat7103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2004, 04:45 PM   #7
trx
Skoolie
 
trx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Elk River, MN
Posts: 113
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: Chevy C-60
Engine: 8.2L Turbo Detroit Diesel
Rated Cap: 77
Send a message via ICQ to trx
You mean something like this?

(click for larger version)

Not mine but it looks cool. Chrome stacks are not cheap.

Chad
http://trx.punknet.org/geeklog/public_h ... Conversion
trx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2004, 11:49 PM   #8
Skoolie
 
Firearm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 243
Send a message via ICQ to Firearm Send a message via AIM to Firearm
4 barrel carb does not necessarily mean greater fuel consumption. The second two barrels only open under hard acceleration. Nice to have if you need extra power for hills or passing, but a heavy foot could drop your fuel mileage. Under normal driving conditions your mileage should stay pretty much the same.

Also anything chrome is expensive.
Firearm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 02:14 PM   #9
Bus Crazy
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,839
Send a message via AIM to Steve
I watched Herbie Goes Bananas the other night and the school bus they are using to get around Panama(?) actually has stacks coming up the rear of the bus, one on each side. In fact all of the school buses in the town where they got the one they were driving had stacks like that.
__________________
View my 1972 Ward: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
View my 1986 Blue Bird: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
View my 1960 GMC: Topic from the Build : The Picture Gallery
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:34 PM   #10
Almost There
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 92
stacks

I want to put dual stacks out the passenger side of the bus just behind the door. Im thinking 2 5" elbows
__________________
In search of Bus #2
(Sold)1989 Chevy Thomas 8.2 Detroit Allison AT545 Custom 3rd door added in back.
GM Service Tech
JonCBrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 11:58 PM   #11
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,009
Year: 1993
Coachwork: Ward Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/MT643
Rated Cap: 77
My Holley Economaster 4bbl gives much better mileage than the old Motorcraft 2bbls that most Fords I see use. A Rochester Q-jet or Carter Thermo-Quad will be just as good (maybe better). My friend's International Travelall saw a 2MPG boost (from 9-10 to 11-12) when he replaced his 392's old 2bbl carb with a Quadrajet.
__________________
Jarlaxle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optimism is a mental disorder.
Jarlaxle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 12:22 AM   #12
Skoolie
 
Firearm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 243
Send a message via ICQ to Firearm Send a message via AIM to Firearm
Since Edelbrock bought the Quadrajet line they now make compatable manifolds for most manufactureres (Ford, Dodge, etc...) so you can bolt one right on. I was thinking of doing this on my Mustang since I use Quadrajets on my stock cars and love them. Don't believe it when people say they're junk cause they got a bad wrap in the '60 when GM put crappy quality cams in their vehicles and the carb got blamed when they wouldn't run smooth. Lobes would wear right off the cams and flatted out which caused a serious lack of power and rough running. Probably more than all of you needed to know I bet. Sometimes I run on. ;)
Firearm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 11:53 AM   #13
Almost There
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fir Island, Washington
Posts: 83
Mileage

Hi There , My limited experience with gas mileage is that dual exhaust always provides better mileage. Bear in mind that good or great mileage is directly related to the pressure applied to the accelerator pedal by the right foot. Better breathing by the engine relates to better mileage. Some where in one of these forums is an article or two that show a tremendous increase in mileage by smoothing out the under side of the bus. That is going to be my approach. A huge amount of drag comes from the air going under your bus.

Later, J.B.
J.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 02:09 PM   #14
Bus Nut
 
Les Lampman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington (USA)
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by trx
You mean something like this?
Hey, that's a good looking rig! Thanks for the link.

It sorta looks like they'd be a little hard to see past and perhpas infringe on seeing the side mirrors. I suppose this is something you just have to do a trial fit on.
__________________
Les Lampman
1982 Thomas Saf-T-Liner Pusher "Illusion"

Skoolie.net Gallery
Illusion's SmugMug site
Les Lampman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Skoolie Conversion and Old Skoolie Remodel jlhollowx13 Skoolie Conversion Projects 0 01-22-2013 02:41 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.