|
|
06-27-2019, 08:09 PM
|
#1
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Troy, Montana
Posts: 32
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: international s1800
Engine: dt466
Rated Cap: 10 windows
|
flexible solar panels?
I want to put flexible solar panels on the roof of my bus, but it looks like there about a dozen different brands available, so I am interested in any opinions/experience as to which brand is the best. thanks in advance for any feedback.
|
|
|
06-27-2019, 08:14 PM
|
#2
|
Bus Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,349
Year: 1990
Coachwork: Thomas 4 window w/lift
Chassis: G30~Chevy cutaway
Engine: 5.7/350 Chevy Vortec
Rated Cap: Just me and my "stuff"?
|
Welcome to the site, ocf.
My only question is: Why do you want/need "flexible" panels?
|
|
|
06-27-2019, 09:10 PM
|
#3
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
Welcome to the site. Instead of saying what brand is best, lets talk why you wouldn't want them. While they are convenient to mount on a curved panel, they really need air circulation around them to keep them cool, they can overheat and diminish longevity and performance. They can't be adjusted towards the sun, so they will be less efficient than a solid panel.
What were your plans?
|
|
|
06-27-2019, 09:50 PM
|
#4
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
|
Gioco, Solbian, Solara and Aurinco are all **much** better than the cheap mass market kit.
Please don't bother remarking how much more expensive per watt they are.
Obviously. But you did ask for "the best".
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 11:51 AM
|
#5
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Troy, Montana
Posts: 32
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: international s1800
Engine: dt466
Rated Cap: 10 windows
|
thanks for the welcome. the reason why is I guess is purely visual. I would rather not see them up there. They are clearly marketed for rooftop rv installation, so I assumed heat was not a factor. And after 15 years using solar, I've come to the conclusion that there is no huge advantage in pointing it directly at the sun. I guess there are photons flying around everywhere out there?
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 12:18 PM
|
#6
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrien creek farm
thanks for the welcome. the reason why is I guess is purely visual. I would rather not see them up there. They are clearly marketed for rooftop rv installation, so I assumed heat was not a factor. And after 15 years using solar, I've come to the conclusion that there is no huge advantage in pointing it directly at the sun. I guess there are photons flying around everywhere out there?
|
Well I guess you've convinced yourself that's what you want against better advise. Good luck with those panels.
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 12:29 PM
|
#7
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Philadelpiha Pennsylvania
Posts: 397
Year: 2007
Coachwork: IC
Chassis: FE Bus
Engine: DT-466 7.6L Turbo Diesel
Rated Cap: 77
|
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I'm very pleased with the performance of these panels.
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 12:40 PM
|
#8
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Dawsonville, Ga.
Posts: 10,482
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Genesis
Chassis: International
Engine: DT466/3060
Rated Cap: 77
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMORGANSKOOL
|
Have a pic of them mounted?
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 12:55 PM
|
#9
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Philadelpiha Pennsylvania
Posts: 397
Year: 2007
Coachwork: IC
Chassis: FE Bus
Engine: DT-466 7.6L Turbo Diesel
Rated Cap: 77
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by o1marc
Have a pic of them mounted?
|
I don't think i do. I'll take one when I work on it Sunday. It's not pretty but it's very functional.
I just used 4 or 6 (can't recall how many holes) self tapping metal screws then caulked a half inch all the way around. Laid the cables where I wanted them and caulked over them to hold them in place. Picked where i wanted the wires to come through and drilled out from the inside. They come into a 30a charge controller I got on amazon for $20. You can see a little of my handy work in this pic.
|
|
|
06-28-2019, 01:06 PM
|
#10
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrien creek farm
thanks for the welcome. the reason why is I guess is purely visual. I would rather not see them up there. They are clearly marketed for rooftop rv installation, so I assumed heat was not a factor. And after 15 years using solar, I've come to the conclusion that there is no huge advantage in pointing it directly at the sun. I guess there are photons flying around everywhere out there?
|
No, all panels generate huge heat off the underside hurts efficiency, must be dissipated.
And just tilting, not tracking, can double production.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 10:10 AM
|
#11
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Cerrillos, NM
Posts: 391
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: Front Engine
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 72
|
I did a test of tilted panels accidentally where one was tilted east about 15 degrees and one west 15 degrees... the difference was almost double on the panel facing the sun as it rose or set.. but the cumulative effect was similar if you’re not going to move the panels as the sun moves. On a skoolie that moves and parks in different places I wouldn’t think tilting will have a net positive effect unless you’re manually doing it to face south and or tracking east and west during the day. The hardware and effort to do so vs the cost of an additional solar panel or two seems not worth it to me personally.
The bigger thing would be to make sure you have enough solar for what you’re doing, or really more than you need, so that the decrease in efficiency is met by additional volume. My only concern with flexible panels would be that you’re getting enough watts per square foot to accomplish that in the real estate that you have.
Good luck!
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 10:27 AM
|
#12
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
|
If your roof is already as full as it can get and you want still more input, then a tilting rack can **double** production, especially in winter.
Nothing more than tilting towards the equator, tracking more than once a day would get even more.
What such gains are "worth" how much trouble is of course subjective
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 11:58 AM
|
#13
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,831
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
|
I too am interested in flexible panels. the performance degradation associated with heat is a thing.
I contacted Renogy. The rep that I talked to downplayed the problem. There’s graphs that show the optimal operating temperature is 78 F.
Nanoplane installed something like 20 of them on their bus. They installed in direct contact and said is they were to do it again they would have an air gap.
I’ve been trying to work out the air gap for the curved surface. Originally I was thinking about some kind of thermally non-conductive material thats applied to the roof. And then I thought aluminum sheet bent to the curvature of the roof and attached with standoffs.
My latest idea is to lay up fiberglass to make a panel.
I haven’t priced the aluminum/fiberglass options to see which is less expensive.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 12:30 PM
|
#14
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Cerrillos, NM
Posts: 391
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: Front Engine
Engine: DT466E
Rated Cap: 72
|
Check out @busgoblin on Instagram. She has 100w panels that are small but not flexible, mounted in close proximity to the roof but along the curve. It seems to me that that concept, buying smaller panels in more quantity and wrapping them around the roof may be the simplest compromise for aesthetics and ease of install. Once again watts/sq ft might be low but if your bus roof is big enough it may not matter.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 12:50 PM
|
#15
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kingston, WA
Posts: 111
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: MVP
Engine: 8.3L Cummins Turbo
|
Here are mine, and yes, I'm considering adding a "gap" by adding curved aluminum bars running under the ends and center of each panel. These are 100W panels and I typically get up to about 1800W if the sun is "right"
During the Summer, I'm running totally off solar (not traveling yet), running AC / heating for about 14 hours each day.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 02:43 PM
|
#16
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: pa
Posts: 2,528
Year: 98
Coachwork: 1. Corbeil & 2. Thomas
Chassis: 1 ford 1998 e350 4x4 7.3 2 mercedes 2004
Engine: 7.3 powerstroke & MBE906
|
nanoplane, very nice looking bus.
Johan
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 03:03 PM
|
#17
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
|
Given their higher cost, much shorter lifespan, and the extra costs involved mounting properly
my reco is just use rigid framed panels instead
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 04:45 PM
|
#18
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Troy, Montana
Posts: 32
Year: 1988
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: international s1800
Engine: dt466
Rated Cap: 10 windows
|
Lots and lots of food for thought here. Thanks to you all. I, too, did an experiment with my home array regarding angle of the dangle one day when it was generating 14.5v, and it seemed to me that no matter which way I pointed it (it tilts and swivels both) the potential remained the same. However, I have learned from experience not to trust anything I say.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 05:32 PM
|
#19
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
|
Voltage is not relevant.
Amps into a depleted bank (plus additional high-current loading) is how you measure production.
|
|
|
06-30-2019, 11:55 PM
|
#20
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kingston, WA
Posts: 111
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: MVP
Engine: 8.3L Cummins Turbo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeblack5
nanoplane, very nice looking bus.
Johan
|
Thanks, just wish I had more time to work on it ..
WRT efficiency. my panels are paralleled across the bus in groups of 2 or 3 This allows for different power from each panel as the sun tracks across the sky. I've thought of making them steerable (allowing the outer edge to tip up, but I'm not convinced that I would gain more than 10% overall given this configuration. My tests showed the difference on a single panel between flat and tilted on axis to the sun was about 20%. If I didn't want to obscure any of the panels by tilting, I would only gain this on the far side panel from the Sun. Maybe if I was closer to the equator ... .
I do need to work on the heat issue though, I think it costs me about 20% overall on hot days.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|