Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-26-2020, 04:49 PM   #21
Bus Nut
 
dzl_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danjo View Post
Renogy told me the optimal operating temperature for their panels is 78F. I can imagine being able to fry an egg on directly applied flexible panel mid summer.

Renogy is mistaken, or you may be misinterpreting what they told you. 77/78F is the temperature at which their panel was tested (and the Watt rating is derived from), its not optimal, just the standardized test conditions they use to roughly approximate 'average.'


See: Standard Test Conditions (STC) and/or the image of the renogy specs above.

dzl_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:09 PM   #22
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
On a cold winter morning with good reflection from surrounding snowy surfaces, is when panels can produce way over their standardized ratings, to the point you need to give some cushion when shopping for a controller if your usage may involve such conditions.

In warm weather they very rarely even come close to hitting those numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danjo View Post
Renogy told me the optimal operating temperature for their panels is 78F
Not true, at all.

Just that you should install them so that they don't get much **hotter** than that.

The PV chemical reaction is what generates the damaging heat, needs to be dissipated via the underside, where yes it often gets hot enough to fry eggs.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:33 PM   #23
Bus Crazy
 
banman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Moved to Zealand!
Posts: 1,517
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freightliner FS-65
Engine: 7.2L Cat 3126 turbo diesel
Rated Cap: 71 passenger 30,000 gvwr
Quote:
Originally Posted by john61ct View Post
On a cold winter morning with good reflection from surrounding snowy surfaces, is when panels can produce way over their standardized ratings, to the point you need to give some cushion when shopping for a controller if your usage may involve such conditions.

In warm weather they very rarely even come close to hitting those numbers.

Not true, at all.

Just that you should install them so that they don't get much **hotter** than that.

The PV chemical reaction is what generates the damaging heat, needs to be dissipated via the underside, where yes it often gets hot enough to fry eggs.
Is this to the point where if I was designing a roof rack for a warm weather bus I would do well to design cooling fins under the panels and or is there a panel you recommend with cooling fins built in?

I can see where home-fabbed cooling fins may inhibit airflow to where they trapped more heat than they shed...
__________________
David

The Murder Bus
banman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:40 PM   #24
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,831
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
Quote:
Originally Posted by dzl_ View Post
Renogy is mistaken, or you may be misinterpreting what they told you. 77/78F is the temperature at which their panel was tested (and the Watt rating is derived from), its not optimal, just the standardized test conditions they use to roughly approximate 'average.'


See: Standard Test Conditions (STC) and/or the image of the renogy specs above.
Based on all your recent postings I think you know more than I do about solar, so I am questioning my interpretation of what I’m reading, but that article says the same thing; as the temp goes up, the output goes down, with optimal being somewhere in the mid-70’s.
Danjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:50 PM   #25
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by banman View Post
Is this to the point where if I was designing a roof rack for a warm weather bus I would do well to design cooling fins under the panels and or is there a panel you recommend with cooling fins built in?



I can see where home-fabbed cooling fins may inhibit airflow to where they trapped more heat than they shed...
No, ROI on the extra cost not worth it, just ensure air can flow along the underside, 2-3" gap is fine, less if your rack might lift off the roof at highway speeds.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:52 PM   #26
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
Please do not imagine inbound telestaff at a cheap mass market outfit like Renogy are going to have a clue.

Sometimes maybe you might get lucky, but that poor soul is getting grossly underpaid and won't stay there for long.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:55 PM   #27
Bus Nut
 
dzl_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danjo View Post
Based on all your recent postings I think you know more than I do about solar, so I am questioning my interpretation of what I’m reading, but that article says the same thing; as the temp goes up, the output goes down, with optimal being somewhere in the mid-70’s.


I'm not seeing what your seeing in that article. It is true that STC conditions are optimal in some respects (like solar irradiance), but not in terms of temperature, STC conditions to represent real world temperatures (77F panel temperature is unrealistic in warm weather), but its also not optimal from a power output standpoint.


Can you point to the part of the article that you think implies optimal is in the mid-70's? Maybe I'm missing something or maybe I can clarify something you are misinterpreting.


Here is one line from the article that I think should be highlighted:
Quote:
Because of the physics of solar panels, as they heat up, the voltage they can produce goes down. And since the electrical Power (watts) = Voltage x Current, when the voltage goes down, the power goes down.
dzl_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:57 PM   #28
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,831
Year: 2007
Coachwork: Thomas Built
Chassis: Minotour
Engine: Chevy Express 3500 6.6l
Quote:
Originally Posted by banman View Post
Is this to the point where if I was designing a roof rack for a warm weather bus I would do well to design cooling fins under the panels and or is there a panel you recommend with cooling fins built in?

I can see where home-fabbed cooling fins may inhibit airflow to where they trapped more heat than they shed...
I just ran across an article on a hybrid solar system. PVT. interesting idea if you have the real estate under floor for a big hot water tank. Hmm...too late for mine and my bus is too small anyway.
Danjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 06:11 PM   #29
Bus Nut
 
dzl_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by banman View Post
Is this to the point where if I was designing a roof rack for a warm weather bus I would do well to design cooling fins under the panels and or is there a panel you recommend with cooling fins built in?

I can see where home-fabbed cooling fins may inhibit airflow to where they trapped more heat than they shed...

Short discussion on a similar concept (and a company making a panel like that)



I tend to agree with John though, as cool as the idea sounds, its unlikely that it would make financial sense.


And from a technical standpoint you would need to ensure good heat exchange, probably with some sort of active cooling (fans or maybe some sort of liquid cooling/heat exchanger).
dzl_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 06:38 PM   #30
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
I just meant for cooling purposes.

If you got passive HWS out of it by pumping down to a heat exchanger, that would be so cool who cares if it's practical or not 8-D
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 01:35 AM   #31
Bus Nut
 
dzl_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 895
Here is the NEC (national electrical code) voltage correction table for temperatures under 25C/77F.



You can see the largest correction factor (1.25) is for -32 to -40 Fahrenheit. In lay terms that means voltage and by extension power can be up to 25% higher when its frigid-as-f*** out.
dzl_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 07:38 AM   #32
Bus Crazy
 
kazetsukai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Athens, TN
Posts: 1,573
Year: 1999
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: International RE
Engine: International T444e
Rated Cap: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by dzl_ View Post
I don't mean to kick a dead horse but I want to be very clear and nip this in the bud, it is very much accepted fact in the solar industry that PV panels perform better in cold conditions and perform worse in hot conditions. We don't need to complicate it.
This keeps bringing me back to the possibility of liquid cooling (rigid) panels somehow.


Coolant loop: Panels -> Heat exchanger (for hot water/etc) -> Ext. Radiator/fan -> Panels


Seems like we're collecting all this thermal energy hoping for it to go away instead of harnessing it.
kazetsukai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 08:14 AM   #33
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazetsukai View Post
Seems like we're collecting all this thermal energy hoping for it to go away instead of harnessing it.
Exactly! Where some see a problem to solve I and apparently others see an opportunity. Please refer back to post #4 where this is exactly what I proposed.
Sehnsucht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 08:20 AM   #34
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
And again, such systems are readily available commercially, dozens of DIY forum build threads, if you want it not rocket science.

Just that IMO it's not worth doing in the first place, unless you enjoy the tinkering for its own sake

far more bang for the buck tapping waste heat off an ICE and buying a couple extra panels.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 10:50 AM   #35
Bus Crazy
 
banman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Moved to Zealand!
Posts: 1,517
Year: 2002
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: Freightliner FS-65
Engine: 7.2L Cat 3126 turbo diesel
Rated Cap: 71 passenger 30,000 gvwr
Might not be too difficult/complicated to pump several gallons into a "thermal mass tank" under the solar panels getting heated all day and then using the water at night for showers and dishes... I could see this as potentially viable for a "weekender" build like mine. Otherwise I'm filling water bags to lie in the sun for evening use.

Meanwhile, further proving you guyz are way ahead of me knowledge wise on this topic --
John61ct -- what is this "ICE" you speak of? Google will not give a relevant answer to your jargon...
__________________
David

The Murder Bus
banman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 11:43 AM   #36
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
ICE = shorthand for Internal Combustion Engine (gas or diesel)
Sehnsucht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 05:39 PM   #37
Bus Nut
 
dzl_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazetsukai View Post
This keeps bringing me back to the possibility of liquid cooling (rigid) panels somehow.


Coolant loop: Panels -> Heat exchanger (for hot water/etc) -> Ext. Radiator/fan -> Panels


Seems like we're collecting all this thermal energy hoping for it to go away instead of harnessing it.

Its an interesting concept, I've been pondering on and off for a few months, that I'm almost positive I'll never pursue.


I've got a bit of an obsession with efficiency and reclaiming wasted or untapped energy, so the concept really appeals to me. But I strongly suspect that the juice might not be worth the squeeze in practice (in terms of efficiency vs other costs).


However, if you get creative it might well make sense, the jury is still out I suppose.


The pros potentially be:
- increased PV panel efficiency in warm weather (probably in the 0-20% range)
- leveraging 'free' heat energy for water heating, radiant heat, or something similar


Cons/hurdles:
- complexity
- weight on the roof
- it would take power to operate this system (this is the hurdle the needs to be epxlored I think)
-



In the system you sketched, you would at a minimum need a water pump and a radiator fan, these things take power, maybe a lot of power if the pump has to pump water from floor level up to roof level continuously. A fan would be needed to cool the water on the return path to the panels. Could the efficiency gains outweigh the added power consumption? Maybe.


Also, unlike a water cooled engine where the cooling system needs to cool something from 'ridiculously hot' down to 'very hot', the cooling system for the pv panels would need to cool something down from 'pretty damn hot' to 'close to ambient.' Could water that is somewhere between ambient and panel temperature make a meaningful difference, and could it both heat water by a meaningful amount, and cool the panels at the same time?


These are open ended questions, that I don't have answers to, but are worth exploring.


On the other hand, if your main consideration is using the excess heat, not improving panel efficiency, and this system would replace or augment traditional water heating, then it might make much more sense.


One way or another its a fun thought experiment.
dzl_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 07:50 PM   #38
Bus Nut
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lebanon, Indiana
Posts: 911
Year: 2000
Coachwork: Winnebago
Chassis: Ford F53
Engine: Ford Triton V-10
Rated Cap: currently 2
Prior to this conversation I was mostly thinking about it from the convert-waste-heat-into-useful-energy perspective because I wasn't well-versed on the significance of ambient temperature on the panels' performance. Now I feel like it's still possible but requires a little more contemplation because the thermal transfer fluid loop does need to achieve nearly ambient temperature before returning to the panels otherwise it becomes self-defeating if it contributes to the panels' heat buildup instead of reducing it. My expectation though was that any necessary power required to pump the fluid would be achieved through the solar energy because basically if the sun's not shining anyways then there's no reason to be pumping fluid around.
Sehnsucht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2020, 03:12 PM   #39
Mini-Skoolie
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 14
I'm sorry if this was mentioned before but solar panels worked better when they are cooled. Reason for the air gap is to provide airflow to cool the panels so they are more efficient. I know it sounds counter-intuitive but that is how it works.


Gabby
GabbyVerse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2020, 04:11 PM   #40
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 224
Year: 2008
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 0908S
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 28' 9 window
I’d consider portable panels. This way you don’t have to park directly in the sun. I would think any of the renogy panels with a long enough cable to place the panels within a short distance would be fine. On my VW bus I had quick disconnect mounts but I don’t know how practical that is unless you have easy access to the roof
dwood443 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.