Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-06-2018, 02:24 AM   #1
Traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,302
Year: None
Coachwork: None
Chassis: None
Engine: None
Rated Cap: None
Neat Heating Idea


CHEESE_WAGON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 06:34 AM   #2
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Posts: 1,793
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: B3800 Short bus
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 36
I had to look it up. One tealight candle puts out about 100btu. That thing has 8 candles, so 800btu.

For reference, most basic, portable space heaters put out somewhere between 4000-6000btus.
120 volts * 15 amps = 1800 watts (max for most American household circuits)
1 watt hour = 3.41 btus
1800 * 3.41 = 6138 btus

That's a pretty display, but it's hardly a heat source. It could keep a closet toasty warm, though
__________________
My build page: Armageddon - The Smell of Airborne Rust
jazty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 07:12 AM   #3
Traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,302
Year: None
Coachwork: None
Chassis: None
Engine: None
Rated Cap: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazty View Post
I had to look it up. One tealight candle puts out about 100btu. That thing has 8 candles, so 800btu.

For reference, most basic, portable space heaters put out somewhere between 4000-6000btus.
120 volts * 15 amps = 1800 watts (max for most American household circuits)
1 watt hour = 3.41 btus
1800 * 3.41 = 6138 btus
Quite true. However, I think the idea is to help reduce the load on a primary system to save energy. Also, several of these could effectively all but eliminate the need to run a primary system. And I'm willing to bet with the cost of generator fuel and the relative inefficiency of solar (not that it doesn't work, but it does have its drawbacks and shortcomings) that seven or eight of these placed strategically could possibly minimize the need to run a primary.
CHEESE_WAGON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 07:42 AM   #4
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 18,827
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Carpenter
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DTA360 / MT643
Rated Cap: 7 Row Handicap
I could see it being viable if you make your own candles.. and remember wax-burners are quite dirty.. being in the HVAC industry, when i went to service A/C units i could easily tell homes that had smokers and homes that burned lots of candles.. by the amount of sticky residue on A-coil and inside return ductwork.



some of that residue would likely end up on the pots in this case which would make it easier for keeping things clean..



-Christopher
cadillackid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 07:44 AM   #5
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
In a very small space

that is very well insulated and tightly sealed

will make a barely detectable difference.

Not as much as a large dog sharing that space.

Not as much as putting on some warmer clothes.

But nice psychologically, placebo can be very powerful.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 10:21 PM   #6
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SW New Hampshire
Posts: 1,334
Tealights are pretty much liquefied after a while. Get in a small accident or just bump one of those hanging things hard and you've got really hot oil splashing around. No, thanks.
dan-fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 06:29 AM   #7
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Posts: 1,793
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: B3800 Short bus
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 36
Numbers are fun
Amazon sells a pack of 120 tealights for $11.99 (let's say $12).
They are said to have a 4-4.5 hour burn time. I'll go on the high end, so say 4.5 hours.

So for $12 one can expect the box of tealights to produce 120 * 100 btus/hour = 12000 BTUs/hour. With a total burn time of 4.5 hours there is a total of 54000 btus available in that box. If you were to burn the entire box worth of candles at the same time for 4.5 hours that is a reasonable amount of heat! Don't knock over any furniture

Total cost for tealights: $12 for 54000 btus.

I looked up the average price per kilowatt/hour of electricity in the USA and Google gave me $0.12. 12 cents per kilowatt hour. If we're talking about a dumb resistive heater, say a baseboard, then converting electricity to BTUs is real easy.
1 watt/hour = 3.41 BTUs.

To output 54000 BTUs with a resistive heater will require 54000 / 3.41 = ~15836 watt/hours, or 15.836 kilowatt/hours.

15.836 kilowatt/hours * $0.12 = $1.90.
__________________
My build page: Armageddon - The Smell of Airborne Rust
jazty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 06:38 AM   #8
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Posts: 1,793
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: B3800 Short bus
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 36
Since this is skoolie.net many of us are using propane. I'll look at that quickly.

Converting the final output of BTUs per pound of propane is easy enough, but most propane furnaces in campers utilize convection and aren't terribly efficient. Non-venting ones such as the Little Buddy put all the available heat into the room at the cost of also devouring your oxygen and pumping out some unwanted exhaust. But candles do the same thing, so I'll compare a non-venting burner with candles.

1lb of propane = 21,600 BTUs.

I pay $16 USD to fill my 20lber when I conveniently use the nearest gas station. They will fill the tank to the 80% mark, so 16lbs of propane. That's an easy one. $1 per pound of propane.

So to product 54000 BTUs with the propane requires me to burn 54000 / 21600 = 2.5 lbs of propane.

2.5 lbs * $1 = $2.5
__________________
My build page: Armageddon - The Smell of Airborne Rust
jazty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 04:10 AM   #9
Traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,302
Year: None
Coachwork: None
Chassis: None
Engine: None
Rated Cap: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazty View Post
Since this is skoolie.net many of us are using propane. I'll look at that quickly.

1lb of propane = 21,600 BTUs.

I pay $16 USD to fill my 20lber when I conveniently use the nearest gas station. They will fill the tank to the 80% mark, so 16lbs of propane. That's an easy one. $1 per pound of propane.

So to product 54000 BTUs with the propane requires me to burn 54000 / 21600 = 2.5 lbs of propane.

2.5 lbs * $1 = $2.5
Good point. However, I wonder about using propane with this idea somehow, perhaps it might reduce propane consumption by increasing efficiency through the ceramic? Just a thought...
CHEESE_WAGON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 04:25 AM   #10
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 18,827
Year: 1991
Coachwork: Carpenter
Chassis: International 3800
Engine: DTA360 / MT643
Rated Cap: 7 Row Handicap
The pots just create radiant heat. Your propane heaters use the metal plates to create radiant heat, you don’t need the pots.

Open flame propane indoors in cold weather is a moisture-fest.. I myself like heat exchangers
cadillackid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 06:08 AM   #11
Bus Crazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Posts: 1,793
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: B3800 Short bus
Engine: T444E
Rated Cap: 36
One more post to 10,000 Cadillackid! Let's see it!

Thanks for your contributions to the forum!
__________________
My build page: Armageddon - The Smell of Airborne Rust
jazty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 05:47 AM   #12
Bus Nut
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 703
Year: 1995
Engine: DT408
From a listing of a Chinese diesel air heater on eBay for $175.00:

"Name: 8KW 12V Diesel Air Heater Kit
Model: A80946
Specifications
Material: carbon fiber
Color: Black
Size: 390×150×140mm (15×6×5.5")
Voltage: 12V
Power: 8000W
Fuel: Diesel
Complete combustion rate: 100%
Fuel consumption: 0.1~0.24L
Working temperature: -40°C~80°C"

Since most out buses are diesel in the first place. It seems like a reasonable choice for heat.
I'll most likely use an 8Kw in the main cabin and a 2Kw or 5Kw in the bedroom.
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 08:07 AM   #13
Bus Geek
 
brokedown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 3,056
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
I just picked up a cheap chinese diesel heater and will be installing it at some point this month. I'll let everyone know how that goes but so far it seems like a winner.

After a lot of research I've determined the chinese ones are basically all the same core unit, and mostly vary based on the included accessories. Different control modules, different vents.. Some kits have a muffler, some have a fuel tank, some have a super basic remote control.

I picked mine up at Amazon and read a lot of reviews of poorly packed units that were shipped from China. I spent a few extra dollars and got one shipped from the US, and it arrived very well packed.

This is the one I bought: https://amzn.to/2Px9u3K

I'll do a full review when it's installed.
__________________
Keep up with us and our build!
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter
brokedown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 10:40 AM   #14
Bus Geek
 
Tango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 8,462
Year: 1946
Coachwork: Chevrolet/Wayne
Chassis: 1- 1/2 ton
Engine: Cummins 4BT
Rated Cap: 15
Thanks Brokedown...looking forward to hearing your report!
Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 11:12 AM   #15
Bus Geek
 
joeblack5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: pa
Posts: 2,500
Year: 98
Coachwork: 1. Corbeil & 2. Thomas
Chassis: 1 ford 1998 e350 4x4 7.3 2 mercedes 2004
Engine: 7.3 powerstroke & MBE906
Is it a 5 kW or 2 KW. The diesel consumption specification is not clear.
0.1 -0.24 liter / hour? A liter of diesel fuel has an energy content of 10 KWh.
so at full 0.24 liter / hour setting it would be 2.4 KWh input. 60 to 70% efficiency is 1.68 KWh interior heat. rest lost through exhaust.


Curious, later Johan
joeblack5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 11:46 AM   #16
Bus Nut
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 703
Year: 1995
Engine: DT408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango View Post
Thanks Brokedown...looking forward to hearing your report!
As am I. These units look to be a good value.
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 11:57 AM   #17
Bus Geek
 
brokedown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 3,056
Year: 1997
Coachwork: Bluebird
Chassis: TC2000 FE
Engine: Cummins 5.9
Rated Cap: 72
I got the 5KW unit. I've read (but haven't validated) that the 2kw and 5kw units are the same part but differ in programming. Again, this is a rumor I heard and is very likely not true.
__________________
Keep up with us and our build!
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter
brokedown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 12:23 PM   #18
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
The Facebook group on these gives great support.

Make sure to run them near full output very regularly, and occasionally on kero.

Be ready to replace the substandard parts with better quality ones, much more quickly than you would need to with the big 3 makers.

Many are interchangeable.

And **none** of these style units are designed to be used all day every day for long, I think the (better) ones that publish estimated duty cycle rate them at 10,000 hours.

For full-timing in cold conditions a bigger investment up front will pay off long term, examples like Kabola for hydronics, Dickenson Arctic, ITR's Hurricane model. . .
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 01:01 PM   #19
Skoolie
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 147
Year: 1992
Coachwork: sturdivan
Chassis: E-350
Engine: 7.3l IDI
Rated Cap: 10,000lbs
just say'n

I'm looking forward to real user reports. I'm just guessing but if it anything like their hydraulic jacks, where they don't seem to have as many pounds in their tons as we do, I expect that they don't have as many joules in their watts as we do
__________________
Al
telegram: https://t.me/mr_alpine
portfolio: https://clickasnap.com/alpinekid
alpinekid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 05:17 PM   #20
Bus Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,775
No, straight knockoffs of the Planar, which knocked off Espar, very similar in effectiveness and fuel consumption as Webasto.

In other words proven in millions of vehicles in cold climates around the world, of that there is no doubt, plenty of evidence over decades.

But these super cheap Chinese ones are **very** likely to break down sooner, there aren't certified dealers to go for for parts or support, you're on your own with design installation and repairs.

And my point about **designed** longevity stands for even the best quality versions.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alternate, cheap, emergency, heat, heater

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.