|
|
04-02-2007, 12:03 PM
|
#21
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
Quote:
Also salt is worthless at much below freezing. Seems to me that anybody in northern BC would consider it a heat wave when it gets up to zero farenheit.
|
that might have been right at some time, but not in our days. They use Calcium Chloride solutions to wet down the road which is good down to -25 Celcius.
And they even use it on gravel roads, they also use calcium in summer time to keep down the dust on the roads.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 02:15 PM
|
#22
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
|
What is -25 C in real degrees?
As far as I know it all depends on pavement temperatures. There are also rules for different salt mixtures, brine mixtures, prewetting of the mixtures, blah blah blah. It's all my tax dollars at work destroying my vehicles.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 02:27 PM
|
#23
|
Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northeastern CO
Posts: 247
Coachwork: Amtran
Chassis: International
|
Quote:
What is -25 C in real degrees?
|
extremly Fing cold?.. -13 or so if I remember right
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 05:37 PM
|
#24
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
|
[C*(9/5)]+32=F
so.... -13 real degrees
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 06:49 PM
|
#25
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
what ye mean "real degrees"? the only real degrees are measured in Celcius.
Freezing where freezing should be at 0 degrees +0 warm -0 cold.
constant throughout the whole range.
Just because Mr.Fahrenheit was an excentric and wanted to have his own little scale does not mean it should be adapted by everybody.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 07:01 PM
|
#26
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
|
But I contend that real degrees are more accurate since 180 of them measure the same temperature range as 100 degrees in [pffft] Celcius without using those pesky decimal points.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 07:35 PM
|
#27
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
OK we are getting off the topic...next thing you know you probably trying to convince me that feet and inches and miles are better and easier to calculate then cm's, m's, and km's. But enough of that.
So if I understand this right I should be looking for a
Conventional Bus (with the nose) cause they are better on off highway roads.
it should be a a full lenght bus, so 72/48 pax. capacity 11-12 windows
it should have a DT466 (what is considered high milage on one of those)
should I look for standard or automatic I dont mind driving stick shift but i dont know if my wife would enjoy it to much.
still not sure about price, the bus dealer i called in Vancouver said he has a 95 Thomas with the 5.9lt 48px for 19'000 canadian (that is 16470 real dollars) he states that this is an average price for this kind of bus, no junkers all in good working condition and passing test.
somehow i dont want to buy a junker for 2000$ and then spend half a year fixing rust holes etc.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 08:39 PM
|
#28
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 263
|
of course, the metric system makes wayyyyy more sense than our screwed up system. so what? our system is still better 'cause we're america.
so what do you folks up there use for power rating? sled dog power? maybe moose power?
anyway, back to the original topic. what everybody here is trying to say is school systems get rid of busses way before they're worn out. where do you think the company that wants to sell you a bus got it from? how much do you think he paid? probably somewhere between 2-3 grand. or 6 or 7 million, canadian.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 08:43 PM
|
#29
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
yes I was just trying to find a contact for our school district, the local bus yard operator didnt know what the district does with the old buses.
I'll keep looking and start (or continue) dreaming.
wouldnt this make a beautiful conversion
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 09:01 PM
|
#30
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NUNYA
Posts: 4,236
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 3800
Engine: DT408, AT545
Rated Cap: 23 500 gvw
|
Quit making fun of our friends to the north. It's not their fault they have to ride the "special bus". At least the speak english, well half of them do.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 09:09 PM
|
#31
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 263
|
actually, a substantial majority speak english. funny sounding english, but, english , none the less too bad they give into to those damn frenchies and waste time learning it as well.
hey swin, what is that thing. it's cool looking. lotta glass. probably would be pretty hard keeping that thing warm up in your neck of the woods. kinda got a euro look to it.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 09:32 PM
|
#32
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
Pete C I dont think I would be able to afford this one, so i dont need to keep it warm.
It is a SAURER 3DUX made in Switzerland. Used to be the standard for "Postauto" (local Busconnection to most villages in Switzerland operated by the Postal Service)
I just like the looks of those old Buses, and i really like the original swiss air horn. I need to get one of those for my future bus.
here a little Videoclip with the sound of the horn.
http://www.heidipost.ch/bilder/3dux/klausenvideo.wmv
and a SAURER with nose
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 10:23 PM
|
#33
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
|
The language is a touchy issue even for me....ever seen Fargo? We don't talk like that in Minnesota....but North Country (takes place and was filmed in my home town) does a pretty decent job.
I think the choice between a manual and an automatic transmission really comes down to personal preference. There is nothing wrong with an auto, especially an MT643. A stick might get slightly better mileage and need less maintenance, but I really think it's a non-issue.
Different engines have different life expectancies. As a general rule the inlines will outlast the V-8's. I know I will probably catch some flack for that, but the noteworthy long lasting engines (DT 360, DT466, C-series Cummins, Brazilian Fords, etc) are all inlines. If I were shopping for a bus with 200,000+ miles I would be looking for a DT466 or Cummins C-series. A 6.6 or 7.8 would also work, but they're gutless.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 10:41 PM
|
#34
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 264
|
My 2 cents worth: School sytems in most states can legally use a transit style bus for 15 to 20 years and conventional buses for 10-15. It varies state to state but that's the general rule (The Crowns and Gilligs on the west coast are an exception). Therefore, you're gonna pay a premium for any newer bus that falls in those years- dealers know they can get good money for 'em!
Is there really a difference between a 2k bus that was just retired and a year or two newer one for 15k? No, not really. The "just retired" bus went through the same very thourough inspection last spring or fall that the newer bus did.
Our district trades in the older models for somewhere between 2 and 3k. When I go to the dealer to p/u parts those same buses are going for 5 to 10k or more. Same buses. No new work done to them.
The best way to buy a bus is contact all the school districts in your region and find the ones that sell under sealed bids or a local auction company. Talk to the head mechanic when you find some that are going to be auctioned and he will tell you what kind of shape they're in.
Now, there ARE differences in condition like any vehicle. That's why you talk to the head mechanic. He's serviced that bus every month for the last 15 years and he knows what kind of shape it's in. If the bus isn't worth buying he'll probably let you know!
If you want to buy a bus from a dealer for $$$$$ that you could've bought at the district level for $, go ahead.
I prefer transit. I'm not a 4wheelin' kind of guy and I've never driven a bus on the beach (hopefully one day!) but I've put many hours behind the wheel of both kind and it's not even debateable to me. I drove an IH conventional for Home Depot for a while and we got stuck more than once on muddy back roads. I don't really think there's that much difference in traction between a conventional and a FE transit. The chassis are the same (except for the higher-end transits- those are built in house at the bus factory). I'm sure there is some difference, maybe the conventional can go 5 more feet than the transit before getting stuck?
The big difference is this: turning radius and interior space. Many of our bus routes are on narrow, one-lane chipped roads in hillbilly country. All of our buses are transit buses because they have superior manuverability. In another district I drove for the fleet was mixed and when I took a conventional on the same route as I normally drove a transit there was a HUGE difference in making turns. There is more interior space in a transit. A 66 passenger conventional is the same length as a 72 passenger transit. I have 5 children and I know which one I prefer! I have an 84 passenger bus, which gets around just fine.
I apologize- I had to leave this message I started for a few hours and just came back to it. I see some of this has already been covered.
Since I'm from south Mississippi I can say, "Metric-... what's that? That 'aint that new style they's tryin' to call music, is it?"
I wouldn't be worried too much about rust. Yes, you don't want rust but it's pretty rare to see a rusted out school bus- the ladder frame is up pretty high and the parts that rust are usually not structural. Also, I think older buses ride better- the springs don't bounce you around as much!
If you get a bus with an IH motor, get the DT466. The Cummins and Cat work well. I'm happy with my CAT 3208.
All buses (virtually) from the mid '80s on are automatic. Don't want a school bus stuck on the train track with the inexperienced driver trying to get the bus in gear, do we? Make sure it has the heavier-duty Allison MT643 tranny.
I hope that's worth 2 cents. If not, don't tell my wife- she wondering why I'm sitting here wasting my time...
Sounds like you're getting a bus for the same reason we did- big family, like to travel and camp and see beautiful country that everybody else races past. We homeschool so it's all just one big learning experience!
Good luck!
Rick
__________________
Daddy, can we go on a trip again??
'85 Thomas SafTLiner RE
3208 NA CAT MT643
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 10:49 PM
|
#35
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint James, MN
Posts: 2,669
|
I think the biggest difference between a Class C and a Class D bus in offroading ability would be the ground pressure on each corner. The front axle of a conventional holds up a lot less weight which is a good thing with the single tires. The duals in the rear have twice the contact patch so they should be able to support twice the weight in theory.
|
|
|
04-03-2007, 12:48 AM
|
#36
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern BC Canada
Posts: 538
|
Rick, thanks for your 2 cents. It seems you are in the same boat as we are (almost) We also homeschool that is why we figured we'll take the school on the road and learn something while seeing it.
Do you have a floorplan and pictures of your bus somewhere on this site? There is so many and it takes time to search through all of them.
|
|
|
04-03-2007, 08:49 AM
|
#37
|
Bus Nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 263
|
I hear the comparisons between conventional and FE flatnose. Seems to me the champeen offroader ought to be a pusher flatnose. Some of those things look like the have virtually all their weight on the rear axle. I would look for a 35 ft pusher. Very manueverable and still pretty spacious inside.
|
|
|
04-03-2007, 11:30 AM
|
#38
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NUNYA
Posts: 4,236
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 3800
Engine: DT408, AT545
Rated Cap: 23 500 gvw
|
|
|
|
04-03-2007, 11:31 AM
|
#39
|
Bus Geek
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NUNYA
Posts: 4,236
Year: 1995
Coachwork: Thomas
Chassis: 3800
Engine: DT408, AT545
Rated Cap: 23 500 gvw
|
OK, no more teasing. It's not funny anymore.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 07:22 PM
|
#40
|
Mini-Skoolie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 17
|
I have a bus for sale in AZ if you are interested. I know its a long way, but this bus is in great shape. Here is the link http://www.skoolie.net/forum/viewtopic. ... 5003#15003
Dan
__________________
1990 international schools bus
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
New Member-What to buy?
|
lbranin |
Classifieds | Buy, Sell, Swap |
2 |
07-28-2014 10:01 PM |
new member
|
itchy feet1 |
Skoolie Conversion Projects |
2 |
07-06-2014 11:25 AM |
New Member
|
DrJohn |
Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions |
9 |
01-16-2011 04:55 PM |
New Member
|
timbuk |
Everything Else | General Skoolie Discussions |
13 |
06-08-2010 10:13 PM |
New member
|
KDN |
New Member Intros - Say Hello! |
10 |
05-06-2009 06:10 PM |
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|