There are no baby wipes here. We have a 2-week old, so this is fun.
We have no babies in the house ... but I know there are recipes on the internet for making your own. We used it on our grandbabies and it makes a great gift for baby showers.There are no baby wipes here. We have a 2-week old, so this is fun.
We have some cloth diapers and baby wipes, but we haven't used them yet. I changed 5 diapers over the course of an hour yesterday.... newborns are ridiculous - the number of dirty diapers will slow down over the next couple weeks.We use reusable fabric wipes for our baby, and cloth diapers. The wipes are super simple to make and we never run outjust have to make sure they are washed. It’s at least one thing I’m not worried about
If you'll notice, nobody is even giving best-case predictions anymore. What do you think that means?
Don't read into it any more than one should. We need to differentiate what we can do as individuals versus that which is beyond our control.If you'll notice, nobody is even giving best-case predictions anymore. What do you think that means?
Don't read into it any more than one should. We need to differentiate what we can do as individuals versus that which is beyond our control.
Keep your head on a swivel, stay vigilant about hygiene, touching things, and touching your face. Have a good stock of food and supplies. Stay at home if you can. Keep up with the news, but don't be consumed by it, or by fear. Times like these, you need to be at your peak, mentally and physically.
The Red Cross opposes the ban on gay blood donations. It is a result of an FDA rule - petition the feds if you want to change it. The head of the FDA is appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate.
The justification is this:
1. Gay men statistically have more partners and male-on-male sex results in a higher rate of transference of STDs. (This used to be true, but condoms are prevalent now, so I don't know what recent statistics would show.)
2. While blood screenings will catch diseases like HIV in their advanced stages, they won't detect early-stage HIV, etc. However, early-stage disease can be transmitted via blood transfusion.
I don't know how good the science is behind the argument, but the current ban seems clumsy at the least, and it has the appearance of being a result of hatred.
Interestingly, in past blood shortages, we've had tons of banned populations (gay men, servicemembers who lived in Europe during mad cow, etc.) try to donate and get turned away. When blood got short, we imported it from those same European countries, all of which allowed gay people to donate...
If you'll notice, nobody is even giving best-case predictions anymore. What do you think that means?
The issue is that the tests aren't sensitive enough. Someone with just a small amount of HIV in their blood would test negative but still infect other people through blood transfusions.If they're testing for diseases, I'm not sure what the issue is.
Sorry to hear that. That's rough.