Johan, that's what I was thinking as well. The driveline driven by some sort of electrical motor and the engine simply providing electrical charge to the battery pack makes the choice of engine almost a moot point. Theoretically you could install any ICE big enough to turn the generator coil. IRL though it's never as simple as that so that's why I said initially it would be a good project bus, not a good reliable bus.
If I might also disagree with Cheese Wagon on one point - the EGR/non-DEF preference isn't in my understanding the most favorable position to take. As I understand it, EGR is what doomed the MaxxForce line altogether because Navistar was trying to avoid adding the DEF requirement to their engines but in the real world that proved not up to the challenge. DEF isn't without it's problems either but as far as I know everyone eventually agreed it was superior to EGR. That's why International ended up settling multiple lawsuits and now their lineup includes DEF equipped engine models. The buses of the era we are usually shopping could be either/or since it was during this time period when all the emissions technology was coming to market.
Agree to disagree on that one, and you're certainly entitled to your opinion. No offense taken. I can tell you that as an OTR driver, I drove Detroit DD15s, Paccar MX-10s, Maxxforce 11s and 13s, Volvo D13s which I derisively dubbed the
Also a Detroit 60, Cummins ISX, Cat 3406B, couple others. The Paccar MX derated twice due to DEF system problems -- in the same three weeks. Both times it had to be towed, as diesel emissions systems will cut the fuel and not allow the vehicle to go over 5-15 mph, if it allows it enough power to move at all. An EGR engine without DPF / DEF will not do that, even if it is underpowered from choking on its own exhaust. Out of 7 Volvos I was assigned, only three actually made it to the highway under load -- most I found a problem with on pre-trip before I ever hooked a trailer. Two of the other Volvo POSs derated just as the Paccar did, and both had to be towed. One of them only made it 200 miles.
Derating is a function of the engine controller cutting fuel when it senses a problem in the DPF / DEF system, and 90% of the time the problem was the DEF system in my experience. So quite simply, derating and related problems had far less to do with the engine or truck manufacturer, though the MaxxForce was a steaming pile of dog ---- to boot. That Detroit 60-powered Volvo was the only Volvo that did not let me down, and the only MaxxForce ProStar I ever drove that did not derate or go in the shop for related tendencies, they still managed to screw up by not sequencing the fuel transfer valve line feeds correctly (dual tanks, one fed into the other as the level dropped). Only package that never really let me down or left me stranded was a Freightliner with the Detroit DD15, out of at least 14 of these, only one ever had to go to the shop, once for a clogged DPF (at 475,000 miles), and once for a bad fuel gauge sending unit, common on the 2014 model. Drove one with the ISX once and hated it. Hence, I say in a perfect world, if the DD5 and DD8 are as good as their larger DD13 / DD15 brethren, skoolies would be infallible with those. But I digress.
MaxxForce... Don't even get me started, I've already outlined my experience with THAT sorry excuse for an engine. Food for thought, I watched a brand-new PornStar with a MaxxForce burn to the ground from a DPF fire before the company even had their lettering put on. Still had the dealer plastic wrap on the seats. Three weeks later it burned to a crisp and took three other trucks with it.
I honestly don't even like its alternative, the Cummins ISX. We call them Cummaparts for a reason. Three million truckers can't be wrong, unless they got their license at the (S)tevie (W)onder (I)nstitute (F)or (T)trucking. The 5.9 and 8.3 are much better by comparison.
OP seeks to put their life, and that of their family, in the hands of their conversion. Would you trust anything that was known to catch the vapors going down the road or spontaneously combust? I know I wouldn't. As Mr. Toad said, "Shan't! Won't!"
As a final nail in the coffin condemning hybrid / electric buses, my locality bought three or four pure electric transit buses. Bad move, they SUCKED in this hilly region. Passengers were literally having to debark and help push the POS when it couldn't make it up a hill even when empty. They were quietly furloughed and forgotten until they could be auctioned away in the night.
And oh yeah because it is just such a shitty engine that means that there are thousands in the junkyard for cheap.:hide::hide::hide:
I would for sre take a look at it and see what kind of hybrid / electric this really is... and how large the battery bank is.
Be our guest :biggrin: Just don't say we didn't warn you. And just because thousands of that engine are in the junkyard for cheap doesn't mean they will be any better than the one you're replacing. Don't you think they are there for a reason?
Which brings me to newer Ford transmissions. Ive met a bunch of people who have had issues with them. Post 1998? My older 1991 Ford is still going strong.
I was told if you keep the 6.0 PS engine the original horsepower, no chip, etc, they will last ok? I drive gently might be the other reason it didn’t go out in me.
My 2 cents worth.
You owned, drove
AND got rid of a PowerStroke without it grenading? And it actually outlasted the transmission? Keep your cheeks clinched tight walking into the store to buy a lottery ticket, so the horseshoe doesn't fall out... YOU GOT LUCKY.
"Cruisin' down the street in my 6-0... knockin' and weak... gaskets are blown..."
My theory (and it's just a theory, Fords are not 100% my forte, as I've owned far fewer) is that Ford overdrive automatics are generally weak, but are okay as long as they are not beat on and subjected to the increased torque of a diesel, especially combined with the added strain of an extra 3,500 lbs of bus body. Standard F150 with a gasser, probably just fine. GM's transmission quality control really is no better as of late. Allisons are the way to go, and some DuraMax engines got these, just be aware of the fuel system problems they bring with them.
YOu'd have to be a straight masochist to want a maxxforce. Maybe a Maxxochist?
Did someone say masochist? Sticks and stones may break my bones, but whips and chains excite me...
Trucker joke, flatbedders do it with straps and chains...
There's a reason most OTR truckers called them MaxiPad engines -- you throw them away before too long. I just called them M-F for short, everyone laughed because they knew what I meant. :biggrin:
In case anyone was interested, these are the replies I got from the seller of the bus I posted in some e-mail exchanges:
The hybrid is the diesel/electric. When the rig is running you always hear the engine but at low speeds or more so a lack of a lot demand, the bus runs on electricity kind of in the same manner a diesel locomotive works in that the engines on a train are in short, running a generator that turns the electric motors that are out at each wheel, that is a train and that is why freight trains get phenomenal miles per gallon. A diesel freight train moves one ton of freight just under 500 miles on a single gallon of fuel. *snip* We bought it because it's size and condition and looks not the biodiesel fact although buying it because of the electric hybrid was a deal, they are usually $35 thousand and up. The bus being a city bus was more of a political move telling the city folk, hey look where doing our part to save the planet. beyond that the cost of the bus originally could never make up the savings in it being more efficient. It is more efficient but at the original cost being probably 80K dollars more than a straight diesel buys a LOT of fuel.
BINGO. You learn quickly, grasshoppa. Interesting how when we read between the lines of political babble, we realize the hidden meaning of "read between the lines" (and if you don't know what I'm getting at, hold up your index, middle and third fingers together, then "read between the lines." What most proponents of diesel/electric setups such as this will not admit is that they are very costly to repair when they break. Those traction motors on each hub are NOT cheap, nor are they available at your local International dealer in-stock. And last, but not least, a typical truck mechanic may not be able to swap these out.
All that aside, I laugh at the BS 500 mpg claimed by trains. What they don't tell you is that it is moving many thousands of tons, and burning gallons per hour -- of dirty, carbon-based, off-road diesel, not the Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel for highway use... And they are not yet subject to emissions across the board, which means they are not yet catching the vapors with emissions equipment, but the coming Tier 4 requirements will ensure they embrace the same unreliability of some highway diesels of today. (Which, by the way, still spew carbon out when the DPF regenerates, it just does it in a short concentrated burst rather than over thousands of miles). We should ALL be so fortunate to have elevated levels of diesel soot in only select aquifers from rain runoff. Don't
*YOU* feel better under the delusion that you're saving the planet?
