Rucker
Senior Member
Here's something I posted a few years ago about 'tilt-a-whirl' solar panels:Currently have a 200W on my RV and after visibly seeing the difference in charging compared to a smaller solar panel which the owner was able to move and aim in direction of the sun I've decide to not have my next solar panels laid down flat across the roof simply because they're not efficient when the sun is less prevalent during winter months.
Been living in my RV since Sept 2019 so I've had lots of opportunity to experiment with solar charging and having the ability to angle the panels is crucial during winter months if not then adding more panels is the only way to get the same charge. So in order to save money, time, effort and most likely headaches it makes more sense to have less panels and smaller panels which I can direct towards the sun.
The other big benefit is that sometimes the RV lot I was parked at for the weekend only provided sun in the morning and/or late afternoon for a few hours so again I'm left with batteries only partially charged however if I were able to angle the panels they would have easily fully charged the batteries in that limited time.
something to think about IMO
"A quick Google search of 'how much solar do you lose when panels are flat' return all kinds of discussion on the topic, including a bunch of design considerations I hadn't thought of, like,
-some solar panels will need an extra frame because they are not rigid
-on fixed arrays, like on a house, wind forces must be factored in. What if you forget to lower the panels and drive away?
-tilted panels are easier to wash
-tilted panels allow better air circulation underneath and can aid in cooling
Another factor is orientation. If your panels only tilt up on one axis your rig's orientation to the sun will also be a factor in solar output.
On to the actual difference in output. One handy site showed solar panel output data from Phoenix's Sky Harbor Airport (Arizona) as a function of panel tilt and orientation. Output was optimal at 32 degrees of tilt, pointed south, but only dropped by 15% if flat. Other sites suggest 10 to 20 percent efficiency losses with panels flat on the roof depending on the location. The further north you travel, the greater the loss.
Assuming the larger losses and an average solar array of 1000 kW you can safely make up the difference in efficiency loss placing panels flat by adding 25%. At a dollar a kilowatt we can now say the 'value' of an optimally tilted and oriented solar array compared to one that is flat is about two hundred and fifty bucks."
Point being, tilted panels adding significant charging power may not be a foregone conclusion. Lots of work for what gain? Answer that question, and you'll be golden.

