TheHubbardBus
Senior Member
I'm getting real close to starting to implement our propane system. As such, I'm revisiting all the applicable/useful codes. ABYC (boats) is effectively a bit more stringent in some regards, so I'm considering them both together (as I have done with our electric system as well).
Both of these standards apparently require an interior shut-off valve PER APPLIANCE. My question is... why? I get it if the appliances are some distance away from each other, but say you have a range and a heater right next to each other (each well within the acceptable distance from shut-off valve to appliance listed in one or both standards). Wouldn't it make more sense to have a single point (one valve) where gas could potentially leak from, than multiples? Both standards are explicit in this 'one shutoff valve per appliance' mandate, so I figure I'm overlooking the logic in it. I just can't figure out why.
Aside from convenience (being able to shut-off one problematic appliance while keeping the others in play), is there another reason? Could it be because the volume of gas remaining in one appliance after shutting off the valve could feed back into the problematic appliance?
The way I see it, if you were to use 1 valve for an adjacent pair of appliances versus 2, the number of connections would be the same, but you'd consolidate those connections to just one point (which could be exactly where your propane leak sensor is mounted).
FWIW, I'm going to follow code to the letter. But... I really would like to understand the reasoning here. My tentative plan is to co-locate each of these two shut-off valves at a point in-between the two.
EDIT: The more I think about it, the more I'm guessing that the part I just bolded above is why. If you need to shut down a gas appliance for whatever reason, you probably want to cut off the gas supply RFN, and not after waiting for all the gas in the adjacent appliances to be burned off.
Both of these standards apparently require an interior shut-off valve PER APPLIANCE. My question is... why? I get it if the appliances are some distance away from each other, but say you have a range and a heater right next to each other (each well within the acceptable distance from shut-off valve to appliance listed in one or both standards). Wouldn't it make more sense to have a single point (one valve) where gas could potentially leak from, than multiples? Both standards are explicit in this 'one shutoff valve per appliance' mandate, so I figure I'm overlooking the logic in it. I just can't figure out why.
Aside from convenience (being able to shut-off one problematic appliance while keeping the others in play), is there another reason? Could it be because the volume of gas remaining in one appliance after shutting off the valve could feed back into the problematic appliance?
The way I see it, if you were to use 1 valve for an adjacent pair of appliances versus 2, the number of connections would be the same, but you'd consolidate those connections to just one point (which could be exactly where your propane leak sensor is mounted).
FWIW, I'm going to follow code to the letter. But... I really would like to understand the reasoning here. My tentative plan is to co-locate each of these two shut-off valves at a point in-between the two.
EDIT: The more I think about it, the more I'm guessing that the part I just bolded above is why. If you need to shut down a gas appliance for whatever reason, you probably want to cut off the gas supply RFN, and not after waiting for all the gas in the adjacent appliances to be burned off.
Last edited:

