jake_blue-SKO
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Posts
- 252
I simply don't know how resilient that fastening method would prove in an accident, IE a decade of road vibration and flexation followed by a rollover in which the loads and stresses suddenly shift to the roof or more accurately laterally against the roof. I think we've all seen the pictures of school buses rolled over and how you'd be hard pressed to tell they even rolled after they've been righted. The same is not true of RVs and motorcoaches. I think in such an event the shock/stress would trigger failure if not in the weld itself than in the surrounding structure and would travel along the weld creating greater failure than a riveted seam. Bolted/riveted fastening can distort and the most stressed points can fail but as the fastening 'gives' it releases the kinetic force of the impact and then at some point the rivets distort but don't fail entirely until the force is completely dissipated. You can end up with a bent bus but not a collapsed bus. At least that's how I'm looking at it. I don't want to see a raised-roof skoolie turned into a convertible in a rollover and I definitely don't want to be in one.
FWIW though, the engineered solution I'm working on would lend itself pretty easily to welding or bolting/riveting. So perhaps there is a value to each method and the end result could be a stronger and more resilient product. If this is something a pro-welder would like to explore with me, I am serious about the idea of raising a roof just to roll it over and prove my solution is comparable in rigidity to the OE design.
FWIW though, the engineered solution I'm working on would lend itself pretty easily to welding or bolting/riveting. So perhaps there is a value to each method and the end result could be a stronger and more resilient product. If this is something a pro-welder would like to explore with me, I am serious about the idea of raising a roof just to roll it over and prove my solution is comparable in rigidity to the OE design.