It's also common sense that just because I built a 200mph bus that it is up to the driver not to drive 200mph in a 35mph zone.Common sense suggests they would offer leeway up to 80 mph, but common-sense isn't always a corporate policy.
It's also common sense that just because I built a 200mph bus that it is up to the driver not to drive 200mph in a 35mph zone.
Just saying...
Where's the guy that dug the iron ore out of the ground? What about the guy that built the road? The guy that drilled the oil?It's not just the liability. It's the fact that they are forced to represent themselves in court against spurious accusations of situations that are actually caused by a lack of common sense.
When the judge charges the lawyer for the court cost when there is no merit, the lawyer will quit chasing ambulances. Or go broke. Either way I wouldn't lose any sleep.The judge isn't the problem. Someone finds an ambulance chaser lawyer and files in court, then the judge has to look at it to decide if it has any merit. It's a waste of the court's time, but the big corporations don't want the bad press from a David and Goliath court case even if logic is on their side.
I don’t think it’s a question of following the speed limit or not. I think it’s a question of the inherent design capability of the vehicle. If Allison authorized a change that allowed the vehicle to go outside of its design envelope, a valid case could be brought against Allison for going outside of what the OEM said was safe. Don’t get me wrong I totally share your frustration. It was a pain to have to go through all of that red tape just to get the transmission to do something it was designed to do in the first place.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a decent argument, and I would wholly accept it if the same applied to the manufacturers of other road vehicles that are clearly designed to exceed the engineering constraints of the highway system.
I don’t think it is about the design of the highway system. It’s about the speed the bus itself is designed for.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's NOT a valid argument. If they were all that worried, then why did they add the parts, labor, coding, and infrastructure to lock and unlock a gear that would get them sued? As Robin and/or Chris pointed out, it's not locked out in a dump truck and other vehicles. Once the school bus is decommissioned, how the **** does Allison, Thomas, or anyone else know I'm not using the bus as a dump truck?It's a decent argument, and I would wholly accept it if the same applied to the manufacturers of other road vehicles that are clearly designed to exceed the engineering constraints of the highway system.
All things being equal, people that sell hotrod parts would also have huge liability issues.