dzl_
Senior Member
Putting the "composting" semantics aside for a moment-
So what is the process for "doing it right"?
I am far from an expert, and there is probably more than one right way (and many wrong ways) to do it. If you have land its simple, build a true composting system to compost the dry waste from your toilet. But if you don't have land, you need to figure out a more efficient system. The biggest no-no would seem to me to be "you can't **** on Sunday and dump on Monday (or Tuesday or Wednesday) and expect it to be compost, it is basically 'dry sewage.'" If you can design a system that sustains a heat of 125*+ for a few days, you now have safe waste (still not compost). The main principle is you either need a lot of time (not possible without land/space) or heat to make it safe and kill the pathogens.
I encourage you to read this relevant short section from the Humanure Handbook. The expedition/overland community (who often share the same constraints as busdwellers) have been wrestling with this problem as well, in greater depth than is being discussed here, here is a link to that conversation. I think because it is such a niche use of composting toilets, there isn't a ton of information on the legality, safety, or best practices out there in regards to the particular way we use our composting toilets.
This is what the proponents of composting toilets seem to be selling. The diaper or kitty litter arguments are seemingly good ones, too. Again, what is the right way to handle this?
I am in partial agreement with the diaper argument. Clearly if tossing human waste was an existential threat to public health we would not dispose of diapers this way. On the other hand there really isn't an agreed upon easy and efficient alternative to diapers (setting aside cloth diapers or composting diapers). And because we allow (or the system can handle) a little bit of something in situations where its hard to avoid doesn't mean the system could sustain many people who don't truly have a need for it using the system improperly. A bagged absorbent diaper with a baby sized amount of poop is much different than gallons of grown human waste. Like most systems, its overuse that causes the problem, its just a matter of figuring out where to draw the line.
I'm not really committed one way or another, I'm just interested in what capabilities each solution brings to the table... and from my point of view composters bring the same type of capabilities as that of wood stoves (versus pellet stoves or gas fuels)- the potential to manage your own waste indefinitely, given land + time.
Yeah, I'm right there with you, this is the same reason I am most drawn to both composting toilets and woodstoves. But I think its important to be clearheaded about the pros and cons and proper use. Composting toilets don't magically make compost and woodstoves are not the most eco friendly option. But used appropriately both can be used responsibly and ethically, and cause little or no harm to yourself or others.
If I wanted to see how to really deal with waste, mobile and in isolation, I'd probably start by looking at an international space station.
Yeah, although they have the benefit of millions of dollars of R&D and scores of engineeers